Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scalia Lives High On the Hog

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 09:35 AM
Original message
Scalia Lives High On the Hog
EXCLUSIVE: Supreme Ethics Problem?What Was Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia Doing on Day of Supreme Court Swearing-In?
In a "Nightline" exclusive, ABC News chief correspondent Brian Ross investigates why Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia missed John Roberts' swearing-in ceremony as chief justice to play tennis. (ABC News)
By BRIAN ROSS

Jan. 23, 2006 — At the historic swearing-in of John Roberts as the 17th chief justice of the United States last September, every member of the Supreme Court, except Antonin Scalia, was in attendance. ABC News has learned that Scalia instead was on the tennis court at one of the country's top resorts, the Ritz-Carlton hotel in Bachelor Gulch, Colo., during a trip to a legal seminar sponsored by the Federalist Society.

Not only did Scalia's absence appear to be a snub of the new chief justice, but according to some legal ethics experts, it also raised questions about the propriety of what critics call judicial junkets.

"It's unfortunate of course that what kept him from the swearing-in was an activity that is itself of dubious ethical propriety," said Stephen Gillers, a New York University law professor, who is a recognized scholar on legal ethics.


Scalia Mum

Scalia spent two nights at the luxury resort lecturing at the legal seminar where ABC News also found him on the tennis court, heading out for a fly-fishing expedition, and socializing with members of the Federalist Society, the conservative activist group that paid for the expenses of his trip.

http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/Investigation/story?id=1534260
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Scalia involved in recreational activities of a dubious ethical nature?
Why, I never would have thought it! He would never, ever, EVER do something like, say, oh, I dunno... go on a hunting trip with a vice president while currently involved in a hearing that VP was a party to, the whole thing paid for by a lobbyist who also had an interest in the court's decision ... would he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. So, the Supremes are whores too.
What a surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm sick of this little sleazeball Scalia, and all his fancy trips
such as his silk-stocking "hunting" trips with f'ing Cheney.

He ignores judicial ethics. His ass needs to be thrown off the Supreme Court--AFTER the current tin-pot dictator leaves the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Didn't Jack and Ennis go hunting in Brokeback Mountain?
Apropos of nothing; I just saw the movie over the weekend, and really enjoyed it.

That is all.

Seriously.

No other message to be gleaned from an innocent question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Er... I think that was on Kickback Mountain...
and there was something about Burt Reynolds shooting a guy with a bow and arrow. It was all hushed up.:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yep, I watched that last night. I was surprised that there are NO
rules for any SCOTUS! I recall the reporter describing, and showing receipts for, many gifts to the justices. $1,200 set of tires is the only one I remember, mainly because I though it was such a strange gift.

I think I remember there was a SCOTUS who was impeached, or at least came close. I wonder now what in the world he could have done if there are NO RULES?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Their ethics should be such
that rules are superfluous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC