Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If there is a filibuster, what happens then?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 12:25 PM
Original message
If there is a filibuster, what happens then?
Do the Repubs use the "nuclear option" which they are now calling the "constitutional option"? Or do the Democrats begin a filibuster but they don't say they are filibustering? Do they just keep talking and talking until they see where everyone stands? Are all the Repubs going to vote for a nuclear option? Are all the Repubs going to vote against the filibuster? What's next?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Contact all Repubs to block the nuke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. The dems would start fillibustering
Edited on Tue Jan-24-06 12:32 PM by acmejack
the repubs would move for cloture, which would require the super majority. This is where they would need to exercise the what ever you wish to call it option and change it to a simple majority and invoke cloture option.

edit to spell correct
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Then why filibuster ??
Would either Party pay a political price for either maneuver?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. the banana republicans would pay a price for destroying the filibuster
democrats could ("will" is another story...) make major hay of the fact that the banana republicans have to LIE ON THE SENATE FLOOR in order to make their completely fabricated misinterpretation of the rules be a simple majority vote instead of a 60% vote.

not only that, they're destroying two centuries of senate tradition, thumbing their noses at all democrats, riding roughshod over objections about alito, etc.

if played properly, it would go a LONG way in an election year toward bringing out the democratic vote, particularly for capturing the senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. But, if they change the rules, aren't they supposed to have to wait
until the next congress convenes in order to use the new rules? Or do they just make things up as they go along now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. in short, yes. they make things up as they go along
the "nuclear option" involves a senator making the completely fabricated claim that filibusters don't exist, or don't exist for judicial confirmations, whatever. cheney upholds the misinterpretation, a democrat disputes it. RULES disputes are resolved by a 50% simple majority vote, rather than a 60% cloture vote.

this is a transparently fraudulent mechanism that essentially says that ANY RULE can be overridden by a simple majority, via the simple act of lying and upholding that lie, and voting on the lie rather than the rules.

there's really no recourse, because the house and senate basically set their own rules and i seriously doubt the supreme court would ever mess with the internal workings of either chamber like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The thought of the nuclear option makes CottonBear cry.
:cry: :scared: :cry: :scared: :cry: :scared: :cry: :scared: :cry: :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. We already sort of have it now.
It is in effect now, just not officially and without the extreme drama of watching it happen on C-Span. The Dems can't block any judicial nominees now, that is the nuclear option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. that's just in committe. they can still filibuster the final confirmation
unless and until the banana republicans 'go nuclear'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AbbyR Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Isn't it a won't block rather than can't? (nft)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Max Cherry Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. I've got freeper friends that are hoping a filibuster happens.....
They feel it's a win-win situation for them. The Repuks will go alone with the nuclear option and get their Alito in. Then, in the mean time the national conversation is taken off the war and all the problems in DC and put on the filibuster. They also say the American public will blame us if we shut down the congress! GOD I HATE THOSE PIGS!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I don't think there is any plan to shut down the Congress...
However, I think they are thinking of making the Repubs go the nuclear option, just to show how radical they are and to what extreme they will change precedence...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Max Cherry Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. and if they do ............
We'll shut the damn place down..... we've already said we would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. We did ??
I hadn't heard that? When was that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Max Cherry Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. HR has said that........
if the nuclear options is taken that the climate in the Senate would make it almost impossible for any future business to get done. Other Democrat Senators have said the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. You mean stop legislation like "Medicare Reform"
and other great Republican legislation?? That might be a good idea? Hmmm-mmm..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Max Cherry Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Noooow you got it........... ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Oh geez
Yeah, I'll just bet they do --

You might want to let *your friends* know that Congress is not esp popular at the moment, so quite frankly I think the public would welcome shutting it down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC