Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush seems to be winning the spygate war with Congress.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cantstandbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 03:36 PM
Original message
Bush seems to be winning the spygate war with Congress.
He is using the bully pulpit effectively in quoting Hayden as saying had the domestic wiretapping been in use in 2001 9/11 could have been prevented. With no one to challenge him it is a persuasive argument even though he is lying through his teeth. 9/11 could have been prevented if the Bushbots had heeded the Clinton administration's warnings and had they not been so busy trying to undo all that Clinton admin had done including the Hart security findings. The MSM is giving Bush all the time he needs and every talk show is loaded with Bushbots with very few dissenters. They are shameless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DemInDistress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. guess those gopers know america will be hit again and not
to worry for martial law is on the menu...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. people disappearing
hide away camps,...maybe we can call our neighbors south of the border and ask them what it was like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cry baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. don't buy the spin.
I think it's an uphill battle to fight against the * cult and the corporate media, but we, the people, don't like the intrusion. I live in a very red area and no one I've talked to thinks that * spying on us is legal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. BUt it's just a matter of time
give hate radio a couple more weeks and they'll be saying that spying is just great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cry baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Wrong - see this kos post with poll #s - they are in our favor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Then why can't we do a fucking thing about it?
Can you please name me one thing that Smirk hasn't gotten in 5 years? Polls in our favor and $2.00 will get me a basic coffee at Starbuck's. These polls mean absoultely nothing when Scalito is being swept onto SCOTUS. There is nothing like denial to make a shit sandwich taste llike prime rib.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cry baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Are you giving up?
I'm not, we are the minority and things aren't going to move in our direction quickly. More dems are speaking out now than in years past. People are listening.

I'm doing everything I can to make the reversal in attitudes happen. I am not going to give in to the media spin on how "muddled" and "without a message" and "squishy" the dems are. Go ahead, buy the spin if you want to, believe Tweety and Wolfie if you wish.

You can say that I am in denial, but I see attitudes changing in my very red area. I see it with my own eyes and that can't be denied.

BTW, I am going to be mad as hell if the dems don't filibuster. That doesn't mean that I will abandon the party or give up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. People are listening?
Do you have your imaginary TV turned on? We don't have any media presence. The people in your very red area will do whatever hate radio tells them to do. Do you really think they will vote Dem in November? in 2008?

The first thing we need to do IF we are to stage any sort of revival is to start confronting reality. That is that

1. We are in a majority in the country
2. We hae absolutely NO say in how it is governed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. And now that it appears as if our Democratic Senators....
Edited on Wed Jan-25-06 03:45 PM by Javaman
aren't going to filibuster scalito, it give moron* carte blanche to do as he pleases. The repubes will translate the none filibuster into a free ride for moron* and his need to listen to all of our calls.

So with Abu gonzalez, goosestepper roberts and now the carbon cutout scalito, what next does the empire of evil have in store for us?

Folks, if we keep depending upon these Democratic Senators to do our biding as a nation, we will be slowly and surely stripped of all of our rights.

I can't say this strong enough, this is why scalito needs NEEDS, to be filibustered. It has so less to do with scalito himself, but it has everything to do with the future of our country. This one man represents all that is loathsome about moron* and his bullying tactics. If this guy gets through expect the SCOTUS to give jackass* everything he wants to be king, dictator, potentate, etc, what ever the hell he wishes to call himself, before his term is out and we have him as presidenti permanenti.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. It won't be slowly
Allowing the unfit Scalito onto the court will pretty much signify that the white flag has been raised - * will have no opposition to whatever he proposes.

FWIW, the GOP will keep the Dems around to have someone to blame when their schemes prove disastrous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. If our senators won't fight for us, what can we do? It seems to
me that we are at a huge disadvantage with no one looking out for us.

I get so discouraged watching this dipshit shrub get everything handed to him on a silver platter. If any president in history deserves to get nothing -- it is jr.

We need our Reps and Senators to fight for us; they need to speak up and speak up now!! I don't think the country can wait any longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. of course he is...
why shouldn't he?

When did the Democrats ever stand up to him (minus Conyers, Kuchinich, Pelosi) and fight to win?

I'm so sick of washington and their hand-picked, out-of-touch, inbred have mores posing as representatives of the people.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hayden also misquoted the Fourth Amendment.
Clearly these folks have no clue about either the law or the constitution and, as far as I know, ignorance of the law is no excuse.

The Dems need to keep hammering the illegality of the warrant-less wiretapping regardless of the lame melodramatic excuses for doing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coldiggs Donating Member (274 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. ya and I heard on CNN that polls are in his favor right now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cry baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. no - this poll on KOS is a CNN/Gallup poll
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. Ha! So now they're saying Clinton DIDN'T use illegal wiretaps
it's all up to Specter. Don't let America down, Arlen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. Since the Senate isn't beginning its investigation for another three weeks
It may be premature to declare a winner in this "war." Just like it would be premature to speculate on who's going to win a baseball game while the leadoff hitter for the visting team is still batting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. Dan Abrams said that statement is an insult to our intelligence. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
18. This is utter BULLSHIT!
Bush AUTHORIZED illegal spying BEFORE 9/11:

The National Security Agency advised President Bush in early 2001 that it had been eavesdropping on Americans during the course of its work monitoring suspected terrorists and foreigners believed to have ties to terrorist groups, according to a declassified document.

........

James Risen, author of the book State of War and credited with first breaking the story about the NSA's domestic surveillance operations, said President Bush personally authorized a change in the agency's long-standing policies shortly after he was sworn in in 2001.

"The president personally and directly authorized new operations, like the NSA's domestic surveillance program, that almost certainly would never have been approved under normal circumstances and that raised serious legal or political questions," Risen wrote in the book. "Because of the fevered climate created throughout the government by the president and his senior advisers, Bush sent signals of what he wanted done, without explicit presidential orders" and "the most ambitious got the message."



http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/printer_011306Z.shtml

Considering that Clinton advised Bush that al Qaeda was the most important terrorist issue of the day, the question put to Bush should be: "Who or what the Hell were you spying on prior to 9/11 if you weren't monitoring al Qaeda terrorists?"

I simply can't believe that Bush would authorize illegal domestic spying and NOT have stopped the 9/11 attacks!

It might also explain why he did nothing when told by Andy Card about the attacks: he already knew they were coming!!!

WHY CAN'T ANYONE SEE THIS!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC