Huge! Full Page Impeachment Ad in New York Times Today !

[Laura PourMeADrink]

View Ad here:

http://www.impeachbush.org/site/DocServer/NYT_IMPEACHBUSH_FINAL_3.pdf?docID=121&JServSessionIdr006=djbbdempy1.app13a




Message from Impeachbush.org about ad:

Dear XXXXX,

Your donation can help place this ad
in more newspapers. Please click here.


The New York Times full page ad calling for the Impeachment of George W. Bush is in today's paper (January 27, 2006). This ad not only raises the profile of the impeachment campaign but will help bring many tens of thousands of new people into the impeachment movement.

The timing for the ad is excellent. In the coming days there will be Congressional hearings which will examine the impeachable offenses of Bush & Co. The call for impeachment is now coming from all quarters. There is no doubt that Bush and his advisors are well aware that the impeachment demand is quickly becoming a widespread sentiment. They are afraid, and for good reason. We want to seize the momentum and place the ad in various other newspapers and run radio spots as well. We can do it with everyone's continued support and commitment to this campaign. If you can help, click here.

According to two recent polls the majority of Americans favor impeachment if Bush lied about the reasons for going to war in Iraq or if he engaged in illegal wiretapping. He did both. This is a people's movement. As the ad states, "The Constitution cannot defend itself. The people must act."

If every member and supporter of the impeachment movement made a donation, this ad could be placed in newspapers across the country. If you have contributed before, consider making another donation now. If you have never donated this is the time to take action. Please donate today by clicking here.

Let's increase the heat!

[peacetalksforall]

1. Who paid? Who signed it?

[Laura PourMeADrink]

3. I assume impeachbush.org paid with the donations they have

been receiving? There are no signatures on the ad but 600,000 have signed petition with impeachbush.org...

[GR]

2. Molly Ivins Just Said She's Against It...

I totally agree with you. She used as justification the fact that the republicans had wrongly impeached Clinton. What she fails to understand is that the act of impeaching clinton was in large part responsible for Gore's defeat, along with voter fraud, etc.

That stain, unjust as it was, will never leave Clinton and remains a stain on all progressive democrats who abhor what George Bush has done to the Country.

I realize we can't win, YET, on that issue, but it doesn't mean we mustn't try...

We must keep trying...

[robbedvoter]

4. All righty then. If Molly sez it, fuggetabout it. W stays!

he is actually a nice man - Molly sez it too - and subverting the Constitution can't be any worse than a blue dress.
Long live Molly! Can I get a Heil?

[Laura PourMeADrink]

6. Ha ! I bet Ramsey has his hands full - constantly updating the

articles of impeachment with new amendments...

[Laura PourMeADrink]

5. Yes, extremely weak logic. I think calling to light B**'s SERIOUS

sins only strengthens the case that the Clinton impeachment was bullshit. If you just read the charges listed below - no one, in their right mind, could say they are less serious than what they charged Clinton with. I just wish it had listed: Failure to protect and save the poor souls who died at the Convention Center in Nola.

[Ian David]

7. Nancy Pelosi for Unitary Executive in 2006! n/t

[Independent_Liberal]

8. Impeachment is coming! The naysayers know this and they are in denial!

They're fighting it. Like Gandhi said, first they ignore us, then they laugh at us, then they fight us, and then we win. They're fighting us right now. You know what's coming next.

:)