librechik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-27-06 10:14 AM
Original message |
So Google has to coughup its secrets, but Diebold code is "proprietary" |
|
and sacrosanct. Why doesn't Diebold act like a good little AOL or Yahoo and give the prosecutor it's source code?
This is an interesting situation, don't you think?
:popcorn:
|
Atman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-27-06 10:21 AM
Response to Original message |
1. By jove, I think you've got an interesting angle! |
|
Just one more talking point, I suppose. The republicans know they can ignore all the crit, because they've got the game fixed in their favor anyway. But, I definitely be mentioning this point as often as possible from now on. I won't get my hopes up, though. These same people are likely the ones who demand ATM receipts but don't think a voting receipt is a problem.
|
librechik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-27-06 12:05 PM
Response to Original message |
2. vanity kick for the mid morning crew |
Uncle Joe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-27-06 12:32 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Don't you see, it's because |
|
Google represents that bogeyman democracy, and Livecoward does not.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 10th 2024, 09:17 PM
Response to Original message |