bspence
(406 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-27-06 02:27 PM
Original message |
|
Bush has been stonewalling against getting pictures of him and Abramoff in the press. He won't talk about how much he does or doesn't know Abramoff. So here's what I have to say:
"Hey Bush, if you don't have anything to hide, then you don't have anything to worry about!!!"
Isn't that what the right wingers say when they let the government strip their civil liberties? Ironically, Bush wants to be able to spy into every facet of innocent American lives, but then it's his right to keep Abramoff a secret. FLIP FLOP!
|
JuniperLea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-27-06 02:28 PM
Response to Original message |
1. He's not an innocent American |
unblock
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-27-06 02:31 PM
Response to Original message |
2. there's a more direct way to force him to reveal the pictures. |
|
"how do you respond to the allegations that the pictures show an inappropriate intimacy with mr. abramoff?" "we've got a witness who has seen the pictures, and our sources tell us that the pictures include nudity" "apparently the pictures show that bush has been drinking again" "why are you trying to keep laura from seeing those pictures?" "a well placed source tells us that in one of the pictures abramoff is carrying an overstuffed briefcase. what was in it?"
you get the idea.
|
daleanime
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-27-06 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:17 AM
Response to Original message |