Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A controversial candidate like Hillary Clinton will not be able to win '08

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 11:02 PM
Original message
A controversial candidate like Hillary Clinton will not be able to win '08
Edited on Fri Jan-27-06 11:22 PM by brentspeak
Consider the varying personalities in the sequence of Presidents over the past 50 years:

FDR - Charismatic, always-in-the-news President

Truman - Low key personality, but served during a chaotic time (WWII, MacArthur firing, Korean War)

Eisenhower - The public picked him, I believe, because he seemed like the kind of president who wouldn't dominate their lives by being in the headlines every day. Quiet, stable, not electrifying.

JFK - The public got bored of the low-key presidency, and wanted someone with charisma, electricity. Hence, JFK was elected. The public at this time WANTED a president in the headlines.

LBJ - Not as dynamic as JFK.

Nixon - Bobby Kennedy would have been elected had he not been assassinated. Nixon was a galvanizing/polarizing type the public probably wanted.

Ford - The public was weary of Nixon-type controversy and constant headlines. Ford was the perfect antidote to that.

Carter - More noncontroversial, laid-back politician the public wanted (the public still couldn't forget Nixon).

Reagan - The public apparently again hungered for a headline-making president. Reagan was certainly that.

Bush Sr. - Eight years of Reagan dominating the entire culture brought back blandness to the White House.

Clinton - People wanted young and dynamic again.

Gore - After 8 years of Clinton controversy, Gore was considered a more stable, bland type of politician.

Bush (2004) - War presidents, even idiot war presidents, have never lost reelection.

2008 - Even the fools who are fans of Bush will be weary of the endless headlines, controversy, division. The public will thirsting for someone bland, non controversial, a president who won't seem to dominate their lives day-in and day-out.

Hillary Clinton is definitely not that. John Kerry might be considered in the "controversial" category, too (through no fault of his own -- ie. SwiftBoat smears).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh give it a rest
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
zalinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Yeah, give it a rest.........that was my thought exactly
Edited on Fri Jan-27-06 11:17 PM by zalinda
I guess some just need to start threads, or whatever because they have nothing better to do.

zalinda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. You guessed wrong
The point of my thread isn't entirely about Hillary Clinton -- it's more about the kind of president the American people will/won't want in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. here's the bigger problem
The public will elect whoever the neo-conservatives decide when they hack the vote.

I will vote for whatever dem. But we need an inarguably charismatic, vibrant figure, so that when he loses Americans will wake up to just how much they've lost. Let's hope someone has that candidate hidden in their closet, because I don't see him/her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. That is why McCain is our biggest threat
Even though he is a fake war hero :sarcasm: he is unflashy and has his name on several laws. He appears stable (but is more than likely not). He has allowed Bush/Rove to spank him when push came to shove. Bush has probably promised him the WH if he plays along once in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I'm thinking the same thing
Mark Warner or Gen.Clark would be good Dem candidates -- neither one is a polarizing figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. How many of the "Hillary Can't Win" threads....
Are we going to be treated to every night.... :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. amen n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caoimhe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I'm tired of it too
fucking negativity.. take it to freeperland.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. You sound "tired" about everything in general
I can also tell you didn't even read my post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
10. "War presidents... have never lost reelection"--NOT. Bush Sr. was a
war prez, in fact, WON his Iraq war in spectacular fashion. Got his ass drummed out of office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. The Iraq War was over
I meant by a "war president": a president who's serving while a war is still underway (ie. FDR).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. LBJ...
Drummed out at the height of Vietnam...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. Enough about 2008 already!
I thought we had an election THIS YEAR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Point well taken
I started this thread in response to Bush's talking about Hillary Clinton. But, yeah, I agree that we should be concentrating on midterm elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Okay
Edited on Fri Jan-27-06 11:47 PM by ih8thegop
It's just that hearing about 2008 when we have an electiopn this year turns me off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC