Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FOX News Twists Its Own Polling Data To Advocate War Against Iran

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Mark E. Smith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 10:50 AM
Original message
FOX News Twists Its Own Polling Data To Advocate War Against Iran
Edited on Sat Jan-28-06 11:04 AM by Mark E. Smith
News Hounds 1/28/06

In a really frightening Hannity & Comes last night, FOX News pundits twisted the results of the network's own poll to make it look like the public wants to go to war against Iran. Five war-mongers, including faux liberal Bob Beckel, spoke enthusiastically about military action. No opposing voices were present. While they were at it, at least one person thought we should go after the Palestinians, too. Whatever happened to the notion that the overthrow of Saddam would bring peace and stability to the region? Nobody mentioned it. Nor did anyone say a word about enlisting either themselves or any family member in either of these supposedly necessary wars.

Much of the discussion was based on a FOX News poll out the same day. 13 of the poll's 41 questions were about Iran. No other topic in the poll had so many questions. One of the questions asked was "If diplomacy fails (author's emphasis), which of the following U.S. military options would you support to stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons?" Out of several choices, 59% said, "using whatever military force is necessary." On Hannity & Colmes, everybody overlooked the poll's pre-condition of diplomacy failing, and talked about the public's enthusiasm for war with Iran.

(Later...)

Beckel asked Coulter what made the Iran issue so "dramatic and quickly developing in the United States?" Note: Beckel ignored the fact that the poll itself made Iran a focus but even more importantly, in his zeal to buddy up to the conservatives he overlooked Question 14 of the poll: What topic are you most interested in hearing the president talk about during his (State of the Union) speech? The top three answers were Iraq, Economy/Jobs, Terrorism/Security. Iran was 12th on the list.

http://www.newshounds.us/2006/01/28/fox_news_twists_its_own_polling_data_to_advocate_war_against_iran.php

FOX News poll @ http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/poll_012606.pdf

Two things:

1) It is my feeling that the election results in Iraq make it imperative (in the minds of the Bushies) to launch a war against Iran. In their viewpoint to pull our troops out of Iraq without first neutralizing Iran is tantamount to surrendering Iraq to Tehran. We're probably going to hear a whole lot from Fudgie Bush about Iran Tuesday night.

2) This FOX News poll shows Bush's approval at 41%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Randolph Hurst "You provide the war and I'll provide the bodies"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdurod1 Donating Member (328 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Drums of war...
Iran is years from a bomb. $120/barrel oil, another thing. Hamas will be overthrown by the Israelis. Iran would overwehm and sink US Navy ships in the gulf.. What? limited nuc or conventional war??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. We should just let Bush attack Iran
and sit back as America loses consecutive wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Iran, and Western bourgeois democracies collapse overnight for lack of fuel. The Left should not even bother with picking up the pieces afterwards, we can build a better world on top of the ashes of Imperialism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. the planet can't take anymore
depleted uranium,phosphorus and all the other delightful toxic weaponry :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theophilus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. This is a great point. The problems with Depleted Uranium
need to be trumpeted. Isn't this a danger to everyone? To me and YOU! If enough people get concerned about this maybe it will be outlawed. That should slow down the madness, at least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdurod1 Donating Member (328 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. KE= 1/2Mass * velocity squared...
and Uranium is pretty heavy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Maybe that's what it will take
Blood wil flow in the streets of amerika--

Just like the sixties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdurod1 Donating Member (328 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Bullshit Saigon1968
Tet wasn't shit compared to this. We've got a whole region/religion. I don't want to discount your service. I've just met Americans that want a "REVOLUTION". Fuck Kstreet!...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. ??? sorry I don't understand
what you are saying
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chat_noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. poll stats







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
9. Maybe they should recruit the FoxNews audience to fight this war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. Fox twisted it's own poll? I'm shocked, shocked I say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
13. George Bush is the best thing that has happened to Islamic radicalism
since Israel was founded.

Between Hamas and the Taliban and Iran and Iraq and Pakistan, Bush is succeeding in energizing- and perhaps uniting- a large part of the world against us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mark E. Smith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. I wonder why this was moved from LBN?
9 recs, very current issue.

Oh well.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Because it doesn't meet the rules.
It belongs in GD. That in now way belittles its importance--it's just a classification issue.
LBN is for sourced news articles only & the subject is to be the headline of the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mark E. Smith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Ok
Edited on Sat Jan-28-06 10:45 PM by Mark E. Smith

Ok
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raydawg1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
17. What are they going to go to war with? The imaginary new recruits?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC