Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A way for W to cut his Iraq problem in half?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 04:22 PM
Original message
A way for W to cut his Iraq problem in half?
Suppose Iraq were divided into a Western Zone and an Eastern Zone. Security in the Eastern Zone could be provided by either Russia or China.

Lots of Iraqis might dislike the idea of their country being divided in half, but wouldn't that be better than civil war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. And then we can build a big fucking wall right through the
heart of Baghdad. Sheesh, what a horrible idea. Who gets the half with the oil?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm sure that Iranians,
with their history that goes back to Persia and before, would willingly allow themselves to be approtioned-NOT. Russia is making overtures to Iran right now; they will be interested in keeping the country (and its oil reserves) intact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. This thread is about IraQQQ, not IraNNN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. oops!
Sorry. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. No problem. The Iran situation is just a war of words right now. Let's
hope that it remains just a war of words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigma000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. You want to offer half of Iraq to the Russians and the Chinese?
The Iraqis might have a problem with this. And their new government (if it ever gets going) will be far more pro-Iran than Russia or China.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. The idea isn't that Russia or China would own the Eastern Zone.
The idea is that Russia or China would provide security in the Eastern Zone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigma000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It's not a bad idea to internationalize this problem
but I fear the Russians and Chinese might be seen as willing to move in permanently. And while Iraqis may fear the same of the US, they know the American people have a short attention span and will want their troops how sometime soon. The Chinese government certainly have much less public pressure to cope with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Re fear the government of Russia or China might keep a presence in Iraq
It's not a bad idea to internationalize this problem, but I fear the Russians and Chinese might be seen as willing to move in permanently.

If there are reasons that the Russian government is reluctant to provide security in one zone of Iraq, then is it possible that those reasons might motivate the Russian government to keep troops in Iraq only for a temporary period of time?

Same question for the government of China.

One more question: what ideas do you have for internationalizing the problem?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hvn_nbr_2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'm probably crazy to even respond to this
When a country's divisions are three-way ethnic divisions, you want to divide it into two geographically?

Just why would China and Russia want to bail us out of the mess we made? Are they so buddy-buddy now that they'd want to jump into this cesspool together?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. it was a silly notion I agree. it would only double * problems
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. I don't see anything crazy about discussing things on a discussion board
Edited on Sun Jan-29-06 08:26 PM by Boojatta
"When a country's divisions are three-way ethnic divisions, you want to divide it into two geographically?"
Why do you raise the issue of ethnic divisions?

"Just why would China and Russia want to bail us out of the mess we made?"
Maybe Russia or China would be motivated by a desire, not to bail out the USA, but simply to play a larger role in the Middle East.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. it would be for humantarian reasons i'm sure
the poor iraqi citizens are taking a real fucking from the coallition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oblivious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. This is funny. "Come join us in the quicksand. It's nice!"
Or "Can you pull us out of the quicksand and jump in afterwards?"

Like the Russians didn't learn anything from Afghanistan.

Like any other country would be stupid enough to go into Iraq now. Most of the fake allies have already come and gone. Only the hard-core obtuse remain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. "Like the Russians didn't learn anything from Afghanistan."
What did the Russians learn from Afghanistan? Did they learn that if they mess up a country then they can just leave? Maybe Russia should be providing more humanitarian aid to Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oblivious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I guess they learned the meaning of 'quagmire'.
And how foreign adventures can bankrupt an empire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC