Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Newsweek: Bush appointees revolted over executive branch 'overreach'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 08:36 AM
Original message
Newsweek: Bush appointees revolted over executive branch 'overreach'
Newsweek: Bush appointees revolted over executive branch 'overreach'

Goldsmith and other Justice Department lawyers, backed by their intrepid boss Comey, had stood up to the hard-liners, centered in the office of the vice president, who wanted to give the president virtually unlimited powers in the war on terror. Demanding that the White House stop using what they saw as farfetched rationales for riding rough-shod over the law and the Constitution, Goldsmith and the others fought to bring government spying and interrogation methods within the law. They did so at their peril; ostracized, some were denied promotions, while others left for more comfortable climes in private law firms and academia. Some went so far as to line up private lawyers in 2004, anticipating that the president's eavesdropping program would draw scrutiny from Congress, if not prosecutors. These government attorneys did not always succeed, but their efforts went a long way toward vindicating the principle of a nation of laws and not men.

In December 2003, Goldsmith was steering the White House Official of Legal counsel. He informed the Defense Department that their March 2003 torture memo was "under review" and could no longer be relied upon. It is almost unheard-of for an administration to overturn its own OLC opinions. Cheney's chief of staff was beside himself. But his problems with Goldsmith were just beginning. In the jittery aftermath of 9/11, the Bush administration had pushed the top-secret National Security Agency to do a better and more expansive job of electronically eavesdropping on Al Qaeda's global communications. Under existing law—the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA, adopted in 1978 as a post-Watergate reform—the NSA needed (in the opinion of most legal experts) to get a warrant to eavesdrop on communications coming into or going out of the United States. Reasoning that there was no time to obtain warrants from a secret court set up under FISA (a sometimes cumbersome process), the Bush administration justified going around the law by invoking a post-9/11 congressional resolution authorizing use of force against global terror.


There was one catch: the secret program had to be reapproved by the attorney general every 45 days. It was Goldsmith's job to advise the A.G. on the legality of the program. In March 2004, John Ashcroft was in the hospital with a serious pancreatic condition. At Justice, Comey, Ashcroft's No. 2, was acting as attorney general. The grandson of an Irish cop and a former U.S. attorney from Manhattan, Comey, 45, is a straight arrow. (It was Comey who appointed his friend—the equally straitlaced and dogged Patrick Fitzgerald—to be the special prosecutor in the Valerie Plame leak-investigation case.) Goldsmith raised with Comey serious questions about the secret eavesdropping program, according to two sources familiar with the episode. The White House was told: no reauthorization.

Ultimately, a compromise was worked out. But Goldsmith would eventually be sidelined and leave for Harvard, taking a post in academia.

http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Newsweek_Bush_appointees_revolted_over_executive_0129.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. I hope these people get invited to Specters Feb 6 party.
I have an awful feeling that is just gonna be another bloody Liars Ball.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm tempted to say
drip drip drip... but with the RW control of the media, will this story even make the big time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sundancekid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. more background and contact data for Goldsmith at Harvard - link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. Well their work is in vain...
Now that AG Gonzales is there claiming powers that would fulfill the essence of "dictatorial" in normal places
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Gonzales' problem is that
he was WH Counsel telling Bush it was OK to do this. He has no choice but to write a 40 page "opinion" (just like something everyone has) in an attempt to stay out of prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CAG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. Why did * appoint all these 'murka-hating hippie libruls into his
administration in the first place????

These people are just obviously traitors to God's choice for the US administration.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. Wow! You know things are FUBAR when Ashcroft looks like a "good" guy
compared to some of the other people involved in authorizing torture and warrantless spying. David Addington, formerly counsel, now chief of staff to Cheney sounds particularly evil, and Ashcroft actually stood up to him and Bush and Cheney not once, but twice to support his people who were saying that Bush did not have the authority to torture and to conduct domestic wiretaps without a warrant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
8. more plus Newsweek Link
"Like his boss, Addington has long believed that the executive branch was pitifully weakened by the backlash from Vietnam and the Watergate scandal. Fearful of investigative reporters and congressional subpoenas, soldiers and spies had become timid—"risk averse" in bureaucratic jargon. To Addington and Cheney, the 9/11 attacks—and the threat of more and worse to come—were perfect justification for unleashing the CIA and other long-blunted weapons in the national-security arsenal. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, who disdains lawyers, was ready to go. So, too, was CIA Director George Tenet—but only if his spooks had legal cover, so they wouldn't be left holding the bag if things went wrong."

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11079547/site/newsweek/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
9. This is an important story.
This story illiminates what is happening to our country and how unelected men we have never heard of are changing our world, and not in a good way. The back room power struggles and infighting and going around behind the scenes to change longstanding U.S. policy and even ignore the laws and Constitution are frightening.

I'm printing this one out for my files.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
10. So...the tact seems to be it was all Addington and Cheney's fault that
the Chimp was given Imperial powers. Newsweek article seems to be saying that it's now up to the Specter hearings to decide whether Bush's Imperial powers should be "curbed."

Yet we see that Addington and his allies with Cheney and Bush worked to defy the Constitution, pushing for powers the President should not have and it will probably boil down to them getting a pass while the lawyers work out another compromise and Bush promises to do better.

The lawyers who violated the Constitution should be disbarred and Cheney and Bush should be impeached. But it will never happen. Just a "gentlemanly compromise."

We need to go after this. It was illegal and against the Constitution what they did...it shouldn't be painted as a "disagreement between lawyers."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
11. anyone with a half a brain
would be bailing out by now....
forget about ethics... this is just political survival.
the SS Chimp is turning turtle and going down to the bottom

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. It makes me proud of the Irish lads.
"There was one catch: the secret program had to be reapproved by the attorney general every 45 days. It was Goldsmith's job to advise the A.G. on the legality of the program. In March 2004, John Ashcroft was in the hospital with a serious pancreatic condition. At Justice, Comey, Ashcroft's No. 2, was acting as attorney general. The grandson of an Irish cop and a former U.S. attorney from Manhattan, Comey, 45, is a straight arrow. (It was Comey who appointed his friend—the equally straitlaced and dogged Patrick Fitzgerald—to be the special prosecutor in the Valerie Plame leak-investigation case.) Goldsmith raised with Comey serious questions about the secret eavesdropping program, according to two sources familiar with the episode. He was joined by a former OLC lawyer, Patrick Philbin, who had become national-security aide to the deputy attorney general. Comey backed them up. The White House was told: no reauthorization."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC