Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dean vs. Reid?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
neverevergivein Donating Member (227 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 05:49 PM
Original message
Dean vs. Reid?
I'm not trying to be devisive, but I'm a Dean fan, not so much for Reid. There is NO WAY Alito is even an issue if Dean were in charge of our Senators. I guarantee we could beat both a cloture vote and stop a nuclear option. That being said, is this accurate?

Without mentioning Reid by name, Dean replied, "That's a big problem. And those Democrats are in trouble. And they should be in trouble."]

I did not see it so I may have missed the context. But I'll continue to stand by this statement: Without Harry Reid, the Dems would increase in numbers, power, and money. Without Howard Dean, we have nothing worth saving.

And in case you're wondering, I love Kerry (especially now), love Dean, and love Kennedy. Reid, Clinton, and Biden - hurt more then help. Just my opinion. I welcome yours.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Progressives look for sincerity in their leaders.
we're not interested in "playing politics", we want our leaders to act on the courage of their convictions. That's where I see the lines being drawn within the party right now. We can smell insincerity a mile away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverevergivein Donating Member (227 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. What you ask for
doesn't SEEM like much. Really, it doesn't. Apparently, it is. Give me 41 Kerrys to 51 DLc types, I'll kick ass in the Senate everytime. Seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not so sure
I guarantee we could beat both a cloture vote and stop a nuclear option.

I think the first is true, but I'm not at all sure of the second.

IMHO, the DLC is the problem, not Reid. I don't know if Reid is DLC or not, but he's for sure not the worst of the dems and he's been very effective in some things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. no
he was talking about the Fox News guy's hypothetical dem who might get found to have done a quid pro quo with Abramoff. Harry Reid has not been accused of such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. Listen to Politically Direct replay in the archives from AAR...
or Ben, or whoever covers it. Howard Dean covered the whole Abramoff thing, including the tribal issues, very clearly. I think the right wing is looking for trouble here.

It replayed at 10 last night on AAR, and I don't know if there is a replay or what tonight. Well well worth the listen.

I will see if I can transcribe that part from my tape...they were talking back and forth so much hard to get quotes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. The quote you are mentioning was with regards to any Dems if
Edited on Sun Jan-29-06 06:02 PM by shance
hypothetically they were found to be connected like Republicans, to Abramoff by granting favors, etc.

He was say that would be a problem if that were the case.

But what we know is thats not the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. Dean and Reid are working together.
I'm a Dean supporter from way back, and I think Reid is doing a great job as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. Total, complete, and utter bullshit.
The ONLY way we'd have success is with more Senators that aren't from states where Bush won by double digits. This is reflects your lack of political knowledge in a big way.

Note: I love both Dean AND Reid equally and think they're both fantastic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. Dean would not be able to stop Alito if he were "in charge" of the senate.
I'm sorry, but lay off the kool-aid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. Have to disagree
Landreiu, Nelson (NE) and the rest would still vote for cloture no matter who the minority leader was. Reid has done an outstanding job as Minority leader. He has kept the Democrats unified and on message for most of the time (Nelson (NE) being the exception).
Dean has been excellent as Party Chair and has done a great job at raising funds, but being Minority leader is not as easy as you may think. These Senators have constituencies to answer to and they will not easily be swayed by being strong-armed.
If you think differently, go to Nebraska, South Dakota, Arkansas, etc and try and sell the idea of immediate pull out of Iraq, opposition to Alito and the like. I don't think you'll find the majority very receptive to that position. It's not that these are stupid people in these states. It's that they see the world differently then we do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Maybe so, but he let this one go for one reason or another and
Kerry had to pick up the ball. I want to know why Reid threw this one to the Repubs. Especially since Alito is going to be so damaging on the court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. If you were indeed a Dean fan, you'd know that he and Reid work very
closely together. Harry Reid is the best thing that's happened to our party in a long time. He's a fighter, but no one can work miracles. Would you rather have Daschle back?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
12. I just watched the Fox segment, just now. I call BS on this.
The video is up at Bradblog, the transcript is up at Fox.

This is a bunch of baloney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
13. Reid for the most part has been a good leader
In some ways I do see where he is coming from this stance but I wish he would work harder to get the other democrats to jump on this issue. If he helped with them we'd have enough votes. I didn't get to know Daschle but from what I understand so far Reid has been a much better leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
14. Reid seems a little more feisty than Tom Daschle, although I have no
idea if that's the case behind the scenes. I'd rather have Dick Durbin as the Democrats' leader in the U.S. Senate, or Barbara Boxer, but so far no one's calld to solicit my view, so I guess Harry is the ball-carrier for now.

I'm a John Kerry fan since his anti-Viet Nam speeches and activities long ago. Voted for John & John against Dubya and Dick in 2004 and feel they were cheated by the Republicans. Ohio was a Kerry vote in my view, not a GOP vote.

I get sick of Democrats like Ben Nelson and Mary Landrieu voting with the Republicans, although i also realize they don' need my approval for representing their more conservative constituencies. I blame the narrow-mindedness of their states' voters perhaps more than the individual senators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
15. I'll take their help, but Biden especially, after his piss poor
committee performance being so upbeat and positive. He is one of the reasons we are where we are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC