Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So who's happy to see Greenspan go?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Jamison Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 02:43 AM
Original message
So who's happy to see Greenspan go?
I honestly don't know if Bernanke will be a good Fed Chairman, but if Greenspan would have stayed around for a few more years I think we would have had 20% interest rates like we did in the early 1980's. Times were tough back then for the little guy if you remember.

Good riddance Alan you fucking piece of shit.:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rooboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 02:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. My Greenspan rot in hell...
but I believe Ben Bernanke is known as "Helicopter Ben", because he once made a statement to the effect that all it takes is to print money and drop it from helicopters. In other words, shit is going to hit the fan anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 02:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. I was calling for his head
back in 2000 when he was raising interest rates as we were going into recession (or about to) and then he endorsed the Bush tax cuts and still says they can't be undone without threatening economic growth. The great and powerful wizard of Greenspan is nothing more than a glowing green head and some flame throwers providing cover for a little old man with no heart hiding behind a curtain.

And rightwingers want to give Greenspan credit for the Clinton economy. Funny that Greenspan stayed after Clinton, but the good job growth didn't. Although not so funny if you are looking for a job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MatrixEscape Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. So, we are
accepting the Fed as a legitimate institution here?

The Federal Reserve is clearly a banking cabal and a real farce. It should be abolished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jemmons Donating Member (407 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 03:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. Greenspan or not: You might be in for a loud wake up call come march!
The dollar have been under pressure for a few years now and it might get a lot worse in march or whenever the Iranian Oil Bourse starts trading oil in euros. This will likely make a lot of central banks shift part of their dollar holdings into euros thereby weakening the dollar.

The oil-trade exclusively in dollars is the crucial point and what the Iraq invasion really defended. The petro-dollar-system is the key to american wealth: "to sustain the American Empire and to continue to tax the rest of the world, the United States had to force the world to continue to accept ever-depreciating dollars in exchange for economic goods and to have the world hold more and more of those depreciating dollars. It had to give the world an economic reason to hold them, and that reason was oil."

If and when that reason is weakened the US will have to face some harsh realities: Either huge inflation or a sharp rise in interest rates.

Off course there is the theoretical possibility of going to war with Iran, but it is not a likely scenario for a number of reasons.

Check out:
http://www.321gold.com/editorials/petrov/petrov011706.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
schmuls Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
5. It doesn't really matter who occupies this position; we know what
the Federal Reserve really is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broke In Jersey Donating Member (247 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. He was VERY overrated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
7. I'd be much happier to see the Fed dissolved. It pretty much doesn't
matter who is the chairman, it is the Fed itself that is the problem. It is the first re:puke: 'reform' that they slipped through to put us on the path to the corporatocracy we live in now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
8. Is his wife retiring, too?
Good riddance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. I am n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC