Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Herb Kohl's Statement on Alito:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 07:28 PM
Original message
Herb Kohl's Statement on Alito:
<http://kohl.senate.gov/judicialnominations.pdf>

JUDICIAL NOMINATIONS
When a vacancy occurs on the Supreme Court or on other Federal benches, the
President chooses potential nominees for the open seat. Next, various government agencies, including the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, conduct extensive background investigations of the potential nominees before the President submits his or her name to the
Senate. Upon nomination, a candidate is then subject to a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, of which I am a member, and a vote by the full Senate before he or she can be confirmed. Obviously, there is a
stringent set of requirements that ensures the quality and competency of our federal judges, who are given lifetime appointments.

The Constitution gave the Senate the responsibility to “advise and consent” the President on nominations to the judiciary. As a Senator, I do not take this duty lightly. Whether the nomination occurs under a Democratic or Republican Administration, we must ensure that positions on the Federal Judiciary are held only by those who we are convinced are impartial, unbiased, fair, and whose only guiding ideology is to follow the
Constitution to apply equal justice to all.

Since President Bush took office, I have voted to confirm 198 of his judicial nominations and have only opposed 16 nominations – a 92.5 percent confirmation rate. Prior to that, I only opposed one nomination of the first President Bush and President Clinton. I have only opposed those nominees whose views and judicial philosophies are so far out of the mainstream as to place our liberties at risk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. "equal justice to all"
He. Just. Doesn't. Get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndrewJacksonFaction Donating Member (471 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC