Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senators Boxer, Kerry and Lautenberg push WH for Abramoff disclosure

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 08:21 PM
Original message
Senators Boxer, Kerry and Lautenberg push WH for Abramoff disclosure

Boxer, Kerry and Lautenberg Push for Full Disclosure of White House Contacts with Abramoff

February 2, 2006

Washington, DC – U.S. Senators Barbara Boxer (D-CA), John Kerry (D-MA) and Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) today offered an amendment expressing the sense of the Senate that the White House should provide the public with a thorough account of the meetings the President, his staff, and senior executive branch officials had with disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff.

Boxer said, “The public’s confidence in the government has been rocked by widespread reports of corruption involving Jack Abramoff and federal officials. Despite the President’s rhetoric in his State of the Union address, the White House’s refusal to fully disclose information about their dealings with Jack Abramoff simply exacerbates the problem. It’s not just George Bush’s White House– it’s the people’s White House– and it is long past time they got an unobstructed look into their own government. If the President has nothing to hide, there shouldn’t be a problem.”

On January 3, 2006, Abramoff pled guilty to conspiracy, fraud, and tax evasion charges, and agreed to cooperate with prosecutors in their investigation of a number of public officials.

According to White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan, the President does not know and does not remember meeting Jack Abramoff. But documents show that in May 2001, the White House arranged an event on behalf of the group “Americans for Tax Reform” that both the President and Abramoff attended . There is also a trail of documents that show that Abramoff asked some of his clients for $25,000 to go to the event with the funds going to Americans for Tax Reform.

In addition, according to press accounts, Jack Abramoff and his lobbying team had nearly 200 contacts with the Bush Administration in the first 10 months they were in office. Still, the White House has refused to fully disclose information.

Kerry said, “The American people have a right to know what influence Jack Abramoff had on the President and his Administration. We can’t restore faith in government and reform Washington, if Americans see the White House refusing to answer the most basic questions about their connection to a corrupt lobbyist. It’s important to the country to let the sunshine in and get the truth out.” Kerry sent a letter to White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card and every Cabinet Secretary on January 20 requesting this information, as well as an explanation of any changes in federal policy based on administration officials’ contacts with Abramoff.

Lautenberg said, “The President needs to clear the air and answer these questions about his relationship with Jack Abramoff. The claim that the President didn’t know Mr. Abramoff doesn’t seem to hold water. The American people need to know if the White House knew that Jack Abramoff was charging his clients $25,000 to meet the President.”


http://boxer.senate.gov/news/record.cfm?id=251104


Another release here:

http://lautenberg.senate.gov/~lautenberg/press/2003/01/2006202822.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. delete
Edited on Thu Feb-02-06 08:27 PM by Mass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. kick and nominating n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Let's get things rocking and rolling. These bastards can't
hide everything forever. This is fucking war! These assholes are going down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-04-06 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Too bad media helped keep alot of this hidden for the last few years.
Bush should have been preparing to be impeached in 2004, not preparing to rig the machines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. Glad the Alito fight is over and we can refocus on the WH crimes
Press the fight on every level....wear the bastards down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ItsTheMediaStupid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. All crime and no punishment. Must be the Bush administration
nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeahD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. Kerry and Boxer are turning up the heat on more than one front! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guidod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
7. God, I wish we could
have another senator in California like Boxer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. Introduced yesterday.
Search on Thomas


S.AMDT.2704
Amends: H.R.4297
Sponsor: Sen Boxer, Barbara (submitted 2/2/2006)
AMENDMENT PURPOSE: Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.

TEXT OF AMENDMENT AS SUBMITTED: CR S516

COSPONSORS(2):

Sen Kerry, John F. - 2/2/2006
Sen Lautenberg, Frank R. - 2/2/2006

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-04-06 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. Independent counsel time. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
11. Question for you guys...
Is it the job of the Senate to appoint independent counsels? I know the Justice Department appoints special prosecutors. What's the main difference between an independent counsel and a special prosecutor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC