Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question about Wes Clark

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 08:44 PM
Original message
Question about Wes Clark
Today on Randi Rhodes there was some discussion about Clark's involvement/ownership in a data mining company.

Let me just say that I have been a huge fan of Clark. I have been hoping for his candidacy in 08. But I am VERY concerned if he is actually in the data mining business. This is the next frontier of fascism in my opinion - corporate control of every bit of information that relates to you.

I'm not looking for a radioactive conversation but I really ned to know what this is all about. If it turns out to be true, he is unacceptable to me and I will be very disappointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Clark did some work for Acxiom.......
Edited on Fri Feb-03-06 09:07 PM by FrenchieCat
Acxiom is a data mining company dealing with and limited to, publically available information; it is one of many, and not the largest. Clark with his wife, upon leaving the military, with his wife, decided to stay away from weapons companies. A job in Little Rock opened up, and he took it.

Here's some background
http://blogs.salon.com/0002556/2003/09/28.html

Shortly after 911, Clark received a call from two of his cousins who work at Acxiom--plenty of people in LR work for them. The cousins were upset because 11 of the 19 hijackers' names and complete information including addresses, appeared in Acxiom's data base. "Could cousin Wesley do something since the information was not making it up the ladder."

Clark called Paul O'Neill and made an appointment. For three months Clark worked without any pay to advise the government what went wrong. How could Acxiom have the information about people who were on a "terrorist" watch list and intelligence agencies have missed it? Because of difficulties regarding his non-official status coupled with a subject that was eating up his time without pay, Clark did register as a lobbyist.

Acxiom had no information that is outside of the public domain, and the bush-administration's reaction to 911 and the negating of our right to privacy, is horrible.

Edited to add that he was eventually paid.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. thanks for the lead, I'll be looking at this carefully.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abburdlen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Acxiom Corporation
He was on their board of directors (but not currently) and was a registered lobbyist for them at one point. The documents are available at the Center for Public Integrity

I agree there is potential abuse from the data collection industry but I don't believe it is inherently evil. There are so many positive examples of Clark's character that I tend to think he's more likely to shine light from within shady organizations than be tainted by their ickiness. (He's working at Fox but still a good man!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Robert O’Harrow, the Author of "No Place to Hide" thinks well of Clark
Robert O'Harrow Jr. is a reporter for the Washington Post who wrote the Book "No Place To Hide: Behind the Scenes of Our Emerging Surveillance Society"

Here is a partial reveiw of that book from Publisher's Weekly which I obtained at Amazon.com:

"The amount of personal data collected on ordinary citizens has grown steadily over the decades, and after 9/11, corporations that had been amassing this information largely for marketing purposes saw an opportunity to strengthen their ties with the government. But what do we really know about these data collectors, and are they trustworthy? O'Harrow, a Pulitzer finalist who covers privacy and technology issues for the Washington Post, tracks the explosive growth of this surveillance industry, with keen attention to the problems that "inevitable mistakes" along the way have created in mainstream society, from victims of identity theft who have been placed in financial jeopardy to travelers detained at the airport because of the similarity of their names to those of criminal suspects. O'Harrow gives the government's push for increased surveillance heavy play, but he effectively presents the story's many sides, as when he juxtaposes the perspectives of a Justice Department attorney, a civil liberties activist and Senator Patrick Leahy in the first chapter."

As for O'Harrow and Clark, they appeared together at a Center for American Progress Conference sometime in 2005. O'Harrow said this about Clark and Acxiom at that event:

"...There is a guy that I think many of us in the room respect and admire deeply, General Clark, and he serves as a great example of someone who was deeply involved in representing a company called Axiom. And Axiom was one of those companies that responded with – I know that from my reporting – very patriotic motives. They had a lot of that as a marketer and they shared it and they shared it to good effect; it helped. They also saw ways that they could change their business model and become part of the security industrial complex. And one of the people that was helping open doors for Axiom in Washington was General Clark. The reason I raise that is because I kept finding that General Clark got to places before I did and people spoke admiringly of his ability to say what he knew, to say what he didn’t know, to play it straight, and to in every case do it in the smart way, which is why people respect him."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. thank you. I feel relieved. This author was on Daily Show
last night. He seems very credible and if he knows this industry and likes Clark, that's good enough for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. May 4 2005
The conference was "Homeland Security and the Data Revolution" and Wes was the featured speaker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. that's wonderful!
I saw O'Harrow last night--he's very worried about the potential for abuse, so if he admires Clark and says his motives were patriotic, that is excellent to hear.

I've supported Clark since 2003 and, of course, would have been perfectly satisfied in my own heart that his motives were pure, but it's great to hear this from somebody who's overall suspicious of data collection; a quote like this could deflect concerns about Acxiom in the 2008 election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jrd200x Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. I worked closely with Axciom - I know these guys
Wes Clark is (was?) on there board after he retired from the Army.

I'm not sure I would catagorize them as a "data mining" company. The are primarily a data storage company and they do marketing analysis - largley for the automotive industry. They store data for RL Polk and JD Power among others. They are an Arkansas company - same state as Wes Clark's home.

They invited him to join the board because they are interested in winning business with the government. His involvement with the company is not day-to-day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. He is no longer on the board there since 2003
His lobbying gig lasted about four months, as I recall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ajacobson Donating Member (828 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Thanks, good point
and welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC