bigbrother05
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-06-06 01:01 PM
Original message |
Jamie Gorelick built the wall that let 9-11 happen |
|
now she is the reason they can do the NSA data mining?
They (the Repukes) vilified her during the 9-11 Commission for being the person in Clinton's Justice Dept that "built" the wall that kept the intelligence community from sharing the pre-9-11 data and so they couldn't stop it.
Now, Sessions (and who thinks he or his staff really came up with this) pulls out the little gem that Jamie argued that the Prez has all the authority necessary to conduct warrantless searches.
Only one problem, the FISA law was amended to regulate what Clinton had done (it was not covered when he did it, a distinction lost on the RW) by a Repub Congress to "rein in" someone they thought was trying to "wag the dog".
If this bunch of asshats were as focused on doing the people's business instead of doing it to the people, ....
Well we can all fill in the blanks on how things could be better than they are.
|
boobooday
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-06-06 01:03 PM
Response to Original message |
1. The so-called "Gorelick wall" is one of their memes |
|
The Freepers will be in ecstasy that it came up during the hearings. It is their mechanism for blaming Clinton for their failures on 9/11.
|
bigbrother05
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-06-06 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
8. Hatch brought it up again. Gorelick justified |
|
warrantless "physical" searches as a part of an argument supporting the gathering of evidence against Aldrich Ames. At the time, the FISA law only covered electronic surveillance, not physical searches. Feinstein had contacted Gorelick who provide a letter outlining the context of her testimony and how it had been superseded by the FISA revision.
The "Gorelick wall" is indeed a RW meme. She had merely reviewed and recommended the continuation of an executive order (I think)established after Nixon and reaffirmed under both Reagan's and Poppy's administration. The RW loves to bring this up to say that it was Clinton's fault they couldn't connect the dots to prevent 9-11. Of course they forget about all the transition briefings about terrorism being the biggest threat and the PDB saying "Osama wants to strike".
Nothing really new, Clinton did everything wrong and/or Clinton did it first, so either way you can't blame the Chimp.
|
EST
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-06-06 01:06 PM
Response to Original message |
2. It was a different issue, different context. |
|
I suppose these idiots know their audience and will keep delivering the swill that their sycophants crave.
|
Wilms
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-06-06 01:10 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Jamie Gorelick built the wall that prevented 9-11 questions being asked. |
|
Didn't realize the freepers hate her, but I'm not sure she's on our side, either.
|
Canuckistanian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-06-06 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
11. They don't hate her, it's just fake outrage |
|
If what she did was so bad, how come there wasn't a peep of protest while she was "building the wall"?
|
BOSSHOG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-06-06 01:16 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Republican senators know their audience |
|
Its like the Geico Gecco talking to the lizards to go spread the word. Sessions and the rest care not one fuck about the truth, they just want to get their mindless drones to parrot them. I still hear that Sudan offered to give bin laden to Clinton on a "silver platter." Parrots are the source of the "conservative" movements strength. Not the truth.
|
chaumont58
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-06-06 01:35 PM
Response to Original message |
5. You are dealing with people who have no concept of the truth |
|
Even if they did have the concept down cold, they wouldn't care. Repukes will lie when the truth would serve them better.
|
emulatorloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-06-06 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. this should be the standard response "You are either the dumbest person |
|
Edited on Mon Feb-06-06 01:47 PM by emulatorloo
ever born or a bold faced liar."
thier arguments are preposterous and based on cynical and willful misinterpretation of the facts.
(I wish I could take credit for that line, but hats off to Judge Marilyn Milian, The People's Court -- how I would love to see her interrogate torture boy)
|
A Simple Game
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-06-06 01:53 PM
Response to Original message |
7. FISA law was amended to regulate what Clinton had done |
|
(it was not covered when he did it, a distinction lost on the RW) by a Repub Congress to "rein in" someone they thought was trying to "wag the dog".
That is the only explanation we need. If Clinton did it, then * can do it, it's only fair and only then could it be Clinton's fault.
Oh, and one other detail, laws enacted by Republicans only apply to Democrats, I thought everyone already knew that!
|
Canuckistanian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-06-06 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
Although Senator Biden cleared up the "physical search" vs "wiretap" distinction today.
(BTW, we're practically neighbors! I'm near Ottawa.)
|
A Simple Game
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-07-06 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
radio4progressives
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-06-06 05:34 PM
Response to Original message |
9. they're totally bullshitting.. Gorelic laid the foundation for more secret |
|
domestic spying "programs".
gorelic is just as evil/gestapo as these creeps are.
please people, remember the 9/11 cover up commission report?
evil fuckers all.
gorelick was just as much a part of the cover up as all these slime balls were.
defending anything gorelick did, you might as well be defending what Bush and Gonzo et al are doing.
|
bigbrother05
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-07-06 04:24 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
13. Don't think I ventured an opinion about Ms. Gorelick |
|
personally. Just recalling how during the 9-11 Commission hearings the RW went on at length to paint her as a part of the problem that prevented effective intelligence and now they are citing her as a precedent for their "effective" intelligence.
Think they are wrong on both accounts, but have operated on the premise that everything they (RW) say is a lie/misrepresentation since Dec 2000.
|
Bushwick Bill
(605 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-07-06 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
Edited on Tue Feb-07-06 10:38 AM by Bushwick Bill
As painful as it is to believe, that 9/11 coverup has to involve some left gatekeeping. When Sibel Edmonds says that 10 high profile Americans are tied to 9/11 by money funding campaigns, drug trade, and terrorism, I'll betcha a Dem or two is involved. This would explain putting people like Gorelick on the 9/11 Commission. Anyway, my attitude is to let naive Weldon do his thing with Able Danger and try to blow up the official story.
|
radio4progressives
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-07-06 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
19. yes.. left gate keepers were the most vociferous in shutting down 9/11 |
|
investigation... david corn and chip berlet immediately and intensely ran interference operations on questions asked, investigations, discussions, radio interviews and books, such as David Ray Griffin's New Pearl Harbor and the most recent one on unanswered questions, following the 9/11 cover up commission.
anyone watching the 9/11 cover up commission hearings, had to come away from that knowing that every single member on that panel had one mission and one mission only, to cover up the truth and put out a meaningless report to pretend to be performing a public service. everytime a democrat makes reference to that fucking cover up report i want to fucking puke it's bad enough to know that the repukes will do anything to cover up for their fuhrer, but for democrats to do the same makes me nauseaus.
|
AtomicKitten
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-06-06 05:43 PM
Response to Original message |
10. ThinkProgress already debunked the RW Gorelick smears. |
|
Here: http://thinkprogress.org/2005/08/19/gorelick-ignorance/Although I see the same people more than willing to follow the RW trash and burn of Democrats. So predictable.
|
0007
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-07-06 08:15 AM
Response to Original message |
15. Sessions could find his dick if it was in his hand. |
erpowers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-07-06 09:08 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I think this wall thing with Gorelick is bogus and has been proven to be bogus. I recall hearing a story on the radio that claimed that Ashcroft and the Bush Justice Department was just wrong when they interrputed the rules. From what I heard Ashcroft was telling people they could not do certain things in regard to finding terrorists and then after 9/11 judges were consulted about the issues. On each occasion the judges told the Justice Department that they had either interrputed the rule wrong or gave the exact opposite interrpution of the rule then what the rule actually meant. I do not know what source this information came from, but I think I heard it on Democracy Now. I think there was a man on who said that Bush Administration Justice Department just messed up everything in that regard. Does anyone else recall hearing any infromation like this?
|
underpants
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-07-06 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
18. Goreleick simply wrote a template to work with and Ashcroft signed off |
|
on it.
There is a much longer explanation but that it your talking point on this.
Gorelick just wrote up a paper so everyone was on the same page and knew where we were at. Everyone agreed to use it to start whittling down the wall or supporting it. It simply stated where we were at that time. No one had ever put it down on paper until the adults were in charge.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:15 PM
Response to Original message |