Tough U.S. Steps in Hunger Strike at Camp in Cuba
By TIM GOLDEN
Published: February 9, 2006
United States military authorities have taken tougher measures to force feed detainees engaged in hunger strikes at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, after concluding that some were determined to commit suicide to protest their indefinite confinement, military officials have said.
In recent weeks, the officials said, guards have begun strapping recalcitrant detainees into "restraint chairs," sometimes for hours a day, to feed them through tubes and prevent them from deliberately vomiting afterward. Detainees who refuse to eat have also been placed in isolation for extended periods to keep them from being pressured by other hunger strikers, the officials said.
<snip>
Some officials said the new actions reflected concern at Guantánamo and the Pentagon that the protests were becoming difficult to control and that the death of one or more prisoners could intensify international criticism of the prison.
Colonel Martin said force feeding was carried out "in a humane and compassionate manner," and only when necessary to keep the prisoners alive. He said in a statement that "a restraint system to aid detainee feeding" was being used. He refused to answer detailed questions about the restraint chairs.
<snip>
It is clear that the government has ended the hunger strike through the use of force and through the most brutal and inhumane types of treatment," said Thomas B. Wilner, a lawyer at Shearman & Sterling in Washington, who last week visited the six Kuwaiti detainees he represents. "It is a disgrace."
The lawyers said other measures used to dissuade the hunger strikers included placing them in uncomfortably cold air-conditioned isolation cells, depriving them of "comfort items" like blankets and books and sometimes using riot-control soldiers to compel the prisoners to sit still while long plastic tubes were threaded down their nasal passages and into their stomachs.
<snip>
++++
The article goes on to discuss ethical issues involved in the hunger strikes: whether it is moral to allow someone to commit suicide.
Is it moral to imprison people for years without charging them? Is it moral to take affirmative steps to keep them from living their lives as human beings?
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/09/politics/09gitmo.html?hp&ex=1139461200&en=2800c00498318013&ei=5094&partner=homepage