patricia92243
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-11-06 09:56 AM
Original message |
If/when Cheney retires, who will be the new VP? As things are right now, |
|
I would NOT want to see Bush impeached. I would a thousand times rather have Bush than Cheney. Bush being impeached does NOT mean that Cheney will also go away.
Cheney needs to go first, THEN Bush. Not the other way around. Who would be an acceptable VP with the idea in mind that they will soon be the President.
|
Independent_Liberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-11-06 10:00 AM
Response to Original message |
1. There were rumors that either McCain or Graham would be appointed VP. |
|
I hope it's McCain. I don't care much for Graham. He's a self-righteous pig if you ask me.
|
Warpy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-11-06 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. They're both self righteous pigs. It depends entirely |
|
on who the party wants to position to run for office in 2008. McCain has the name recognition and the undeserved reputation as a moderate (he's not), so he'd be the sensible choice. The Dynasty wants Jebbie to get the job, and the fundies want that Allen character.
|
Crazy Dave
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-11-06 10:00 AM
Response to Original message |
2. If my political education still serves me the Speaker of the House |
|
Edited on Sat Feb-11-06 10:01 AM by DaveTheWave
who is Dennis Hastert would be the next in line but as a stunt I think they'd put Condi in the position if it's allowed by law. Wait, WTF am I saying, this administration obey the LAW? :spank:
|
patricia92243
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-11-06 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Hastert would be next in line if something happened to the Prez and VP |
|
at the same time. I think Bush could appoint whoever he wanted as long as he is Prez.
|
Crazy Dave
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-11-06 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Thanks for helping me clear the cobwebs of the brain. I could have "Googled" it probably but it's good to shake-up the ole mellon from time to time.
|
Shoedogg
(515 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-11-06 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Speaker of the house is next in line in that case. Otherwise, I believe the president can choose whomever they like.
(Is congressional approval required of this choice??)
|
tritsofme
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-11-06 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. A majority of the House and Senate |
|
must confirm a VPOTUS nomination.
|
LaurenG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-11-06 10:15 AM
Response to Original message |
8. If there is an impeachment and my spidey sense |
|
feels there will be something, I think the entire cabinet will be gone, poof, unprecidented impeachment or resignation of an entire cabinet.
|
peaches2003
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-11-06 10:19 AM
Response to Original message |
9. VP appointments vs. Constitutional succession |
|
If a VP resigns the President appoints a new VP, i.e. VP Spiro Agnew resigned and Pres. Nixon appointed Gerald Ford (who later became Pres. when Nixon himself resigned). Then Ford had the right to appoint his VP since he was serving the rest of Nixon's term and he appointed Nelson Rockefeller as his VP.
If both Pres. and VPres. should die simultaneously, then you get into the Constitutional succession line.
|
Bumblebee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-11-06 10:38 AM
Response to Original message |
10. Cheney is not going anywhere. I think we are being too hopeful again. |
LiberalAndProud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-11-06 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
15. I think you're right. |
|
Just one more blip on the corruption radar. Frustrating, isn't it?
|
abluelady
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-11-06 11:09 AM
Response to Original message |
|
We would finally get some coverage of what we are and what we want. All the while the impeachment hearings are going on could be more steps in our taking over the congress in '06. If we have the congress we can eliminate Cheney's wants if he becomes president. Who knows we might even give him a heart attack.
|
O.M.B.inOhio
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-11-06 12:15 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Do we know they won't run HIM for Prez. with healthier villains on deck? |
|
Darth Vader could run on his experience, too.
|
Wordie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-11-06 12:27 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Don't forget there's a danger lurking if Cheyney goes... |
|
Whoever would be the next VP would have a huge boost for the election in 2008. There would be an additional gravitas that the office would give the person.
|
Senator Obama
(117 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-11-06 12:44 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Impeachment yes...removal no.. |
|
Since the impeachment process requires only a simple majority in the House, it is entirely possible that we can impeach Chumpster IF we win control of the House this fall. However, removal would require a 2/3 rds vote from the Senate. That ain't gonna happen given the current political climate. Polls or no polls this President is getting away with far too much malfeasance to make me believe there are Republicans in Congress with a conscience. Now I do believe that Cheney could very well get the axe. But once again as I read elsewhere here, "they could literally find the pres or VP. molesting children in the rose garden and not give a shit".
Obama
|
wiley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-11-06 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
16. Excuse me, who are you? |
Independent_Liberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-11-06 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
19. I don't know. I think removal might actually be possible. |
|
I think that by that time enough Republicans will finally be so upset about everything that they may go ahead and vote to convict. It was the Republicans who really got pissed off about Nixon in the end. Barry Goldwater and a few other Senate Republicans went up to the White House and asked Nixon to resign. They said that enough votes existed to convict him. The Senate was 56 Democrats/43 Republicans/1 Independent at the time. Maybe the same thing will happen and some of the Republicans will force Bush to resign.
|
windy252
(742 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-11-06 02:33 PM
Response to Original message |
17. Probably the most incompetent crony Bush can find n/t |
0007
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-11-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:27 AM
Response to Original message |