Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Don't Republicans claim their victory was because of "Angry White Men"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 11:44 AM
Original message
Don't Republicans claim their victory was because of "Angry White Men"
Kind of contradicts their head of RNC when he said people don't vote for the angry ones...:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. wait til their false economy starts to hit the angry white men in wallets
:hurts:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. They also claimed the student vote, the Latino vote and
the values vote.

It's a pile. He lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Montauk6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. WOW, great point, Toots, that's right!
AWM was the rage (no pun intended) at one point in the early 90s.

Remember how every time you looked up there was the anecdote on how, it seemed, every job was stolen by some incompetent minority at the expense of the white male applicant who was a 1000% qualified? These tales were even embellished by the apologetic phone call from the HR recruiter saying "you're perfect, we'd love to hire you but AFFIRMATIVE ACTION..."

There was even that silly movie with John Travolta and Harry Belafonte where Blacks had taken over and the Whites were the oppressed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mr.sparkle Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. what movie?
with Travolta and Belafonte?? i'll look up IMDB.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mr.sparkle Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. white man's burden!!
answered my own question....never seen it, but it looks.....terrible
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Montauk6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It mighta made an intriguing Twilight Zone ep. but that's about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. In a Way, They are Correct
The secret of winning an election is to stir up and channel anger among your supporters without becoming an "angry one" yourself. As a candidate for president, it demeans you and That's why the VP candidate is usually the hatchet man.

Bill Clinton was a master at attacking and going on the offensive without appearing angry. If you don't think about his words, you may not even notice he's eviscerating the opposition. Reagan was very successful at being folksy while channeling anger. Bush 43 doesn't have an angry persona either -- if he did, he might not be president today. And if Howard Dean had learned this lesson better, he might be president today. Dean's town hall speeches were perfect, but the public formed an impression of him from raw meat speeches to the base.

Democratic politicians seem to feel that there are only choices -- be nice and accommodating or be an attack dog. That attitude is one of the chief obstacles to victory in November.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. Hypocracy. It's alright for the Republican base to be "angry"...
but when Democrats get angry, it's "bad".

This is the typical GOP hypocracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. Why yes they did...
...but you see, at least they had the good sense not to apologize for it.

Would that our Democratic "leaders" would get a clue on this score.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC