Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary's angry? Wow, check out her GOP opponent, John Spencer!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 03:17 PM
Original message
Hillary's angry? Wow, check out her GOP opponent, John Spencer!!
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/02/13/D8FODS201.html

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's likely Republican Senate race challenger charged Monday that the New York Democrat's criticism of the Bush administration "aids and abets our enemies" in the battle against terrorism.

John Spencer's comments to reporters came after a fiery speech to the state Conservative Party leadership in which, during a defense of the Patriot Act, he also attacked the administration of former President Bill Clinton.

"I wish we had it before 9-11," said the former mayor of Yonkers. "And, I wish we had an administration in Washington that wasn't an appeasing, liberal, whining administration in the 90's that allowed the terrorists to build up the way they built up."

...

Spencer said that while there was a way to properly criticize the conduct of a war _ he cited Republican Sen. John McCain _ "You shouldn't do it with such divisive and blame-America-first methodology, and that's what she does, which aids and abets our enemies."



:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Damn John
that constitution sure is a pain the ass of conservatives is it not. "Blame America first." That plays real well with the religiously insane and the racists, the obvious block of voters you are searching for. Sad, pathetic human being, perfect gop candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Does he have a chance in hell of winning? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Yes
Diebold machines can count the votes in his favor.

Or were you talking about legitimately?

In that case, no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickinSTL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. right...and the Bush Administration has done SOOOOO much
to prevent the build-up of terrorists :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. The mans a fool and no one is going to believe that crap anymore.
New Yorkers are smarter than the southern Fundies. He's wasting his anger and should run down south where he'd fit in fine with the rest of the stupid assh***S
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well, lets review the facts..shall we?
Clinton was under investigaton almost from the day he entered the whitehouse.
Bush has not been investigated for ANYTHING!
Clinton had 8 years in office and CAUGHT the perpetrators of the 1st attack on the WTC.
Bush has had 5.5 years AFTER 9/11 to catch bin laden..and turns out bin laden is hiding 'effectively'? (rice)and presupposes he did not hide 'effectively' when Clinton was in the WH?

They quote CRAP..that would fit on a bumper sticker..and we have to explain in complete sentences!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Montauk6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. I agree with Spencer! (Hmmm, I thought he just died...) ANYWAY
Our problem during the 90s was that everyone was doing too well, no one feared getting on airplanes or subways. Even when there were terrorist attacks (e.g. WTC I and Murrah), the perps were rounded up and prosecuted to the fullest extent.

What are we... NUTS???? THIS IS AMURRRRIKA!!! We need FEAR and CHAOS and MISTRUST! We need to go back to the 50s, a more wholesome era when we all spied on our neighbors and reported any traces of red, when we shopped for bomb shelters.

We must SUFFER so that we can go to holy heaven AND SUFFER FOR ETERNITY!!! HAPPINESS, PEACE, PROSPERITY: They are TOOOOOLS of Satan!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
July Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. Catch terrorists and jail them, no attacks for 8 years =
"allow the terrorists to build up."

Fail to prevent terrorism even though warned, perpetrators still free = It's Clinton's Fault.

Republican logic at its finest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. Hillary has an opponent?
Never heard of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. Well gee, Johnny, if you and your ilk hadn't been whining "Wag the dog..."
...and "Oh sweet Jesus, save us from the Clenis!" maybe President Clinton could have taken more serious action than lobbing some missiles.


Or maybe you're just full of shit.



Or both. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. Does he know he is running in New York?
And not Idaho...what a moron...

That oughtta drop his vote percentage in half!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. It's probably the Lazio strategy
Lazio found it tough to raise dough in New York, so he kept pandering to dimwits all over Dixie and the West., like Texas' Wyly Brothers....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
13. somebody better turn the hose on John-boy
Um, John, they did have the program before 9/11. This administration had information about two hijackers and did NOTHING about it. Your point?

Oh, yeah. You're po'd.

Thanks for defusing the claim that Hillary is angry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTwentyoNine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
14. Uh..er OK John--running out to buy Duct tape and Plastic NOW!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
15. Just a reminder
This comes just days after Rove's strategy meeting with Spencer. Karl Rove is truly a cancer on humankind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Oh really??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Ah, so Spencer is simply an attack dog. Like Keyes in IL in 2004.
What a pathetic move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC