Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Okay, we all know the "Hitler" rule (whomever it's named after)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 03:19 PM
Original message
Okay, we all know the "Hitler" rule (whomever it's named after)
where, when someone makes a reference to Hitler/Nazi, real discussion has ended and the person who brought it up has lost.

Is there a way that this can be applied re: Chappaquiddick?

I mean, when a freepturd brings up Chappaquiddick, that means that they have no rational, reasonable point left . . .

Especially when the freeptard starts with it . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Caoimhe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Godwin's Law
I agree we need a counter law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. A "Communist" Law is needed. We could call it Chomsky's Law or something
I dunno, but such a law would pen in the Republicans and force them to address the message rather than shoot the messenger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I believe Chomsky is more or less an anarchist
so he would be insulted by the reference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. That hasn't stop them from calling him a communist or anyone else
Edited on Mon Feb-13-06 03:43 PM by Selatius
I agree quite much with what Chomsky has said about the things of life, and I consider myself a moderate libertarian socialist, but it gets difficult to get out these ideas when you get red-baited because it forces me into a position of having to try to demonstrate that I am not a Stalinist, nor do I advocate authoritarian methodology instead of debating the merits of the issue originally discussed.

Anyway, I threw out Chomsky name because it was at the top of my head as far as red-baiting goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trogdor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
17. That would be called a corollary.
The Communist corollary, the Chapaquiddick corollary, the But Clinton corollary, just keep adding them. They all have the same effect on your argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. It means he's exhausted his "Hanoi Jane" references. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patiod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think a butclinton rule would be more useful
Hard to talk to a Freep without him eventually starting a sentence with "but Clinton...."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caoimhe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. I like the that, "butclinton" law! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. My friends invoke "Garcia's Law" with me all the time.
"Garcia's Law" states as follows:

Any statement, action, or thought RandomKoolzip has, no matter how much merit ti contains, is automatically invalidated by the fact that the aforementioned Mr. Koolzip is a fan of the Grateful Dead.

To wit:

Me: "I have discovered a cure for cancer!"

My friends: "Yeah, but you're a Deadhead."

What Mary jo Kopechne is to Ted Kennedy, the Jerry Garcia is to me. :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phillinweird247 Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. You mean not everybody is a deadhead?
You learn something new every day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caoimhe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Sad to say, today I found out that
Ann Coulter is a deadhead. I think I read it on wikipedia. Makes me wonder how that's possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. Godwin's law jumped the shark
(Which by the way has also, in a snake eating its own tail fashion, jumped the shark.)

It was from an earlier more naive usenet era when it was actually unthinkable that comparisons to Nazi Germany and to Hitler were reasonable. 9-11: everything changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. I agree -- Godwin's Law is outmoded. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inthebrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. Nothing wrong with comparing them to Hitler or Nazis!!!!
Conservative don't like it becuase it's true. There movement is heavily associated with fascism (not to mention Paul Wyrich empolyed convicted Nazi war criminals to establish The Heritage Foundation) and appealing to Neo Nazi types. As a matter of fact Hitler designed the holocaust after the American purge of the "Native Threat".

Nazi Germany's history is also heavily steeped in American history as well. Calling them out on it, explaining how the Nazis used the same tactics and the reprocussions is perfectly fine.

Conservatives screaming Commie and Chappaquiddic are nothing more than scare tactics. The Chappaquidic thing is a talking point that seems to be making the rounds lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. The people who scream the loudest about being compared to Nazis
forget that Hitler didn't start out gassing millions of people . . . and the German population was generally unaware of what was happening to their former neighbors . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
13. That was a rule..
.. that only made sense during the last century. That rule has expired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. The rule implies 'hitler' will not/can not return
I contest that premise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
15. Limbaugh was going apeshit on a caller today re: Kennedy
Limpballs said Cheney was an outstanding person and Kennedy was lionized by the left as some sort of demi-god. I turned the channel before Chappaquidick came out of his arse...er....mouth.


BTW, can we create the same Usenet "law" re: the bringing up of "Clinton did it, too"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC