beaconess
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-13-06 08:28 PM
Original message |
Cheney's big mistake - dissing the press. It's all about them, you know |
|
Had he just shot someone and kissed press ass (even just gave a scoop to Chris or Sean or Brit), he would have been home free.
But he obviously hasn't learned that the press couldn't care less about wrongdoing by our public officials. But if you diss THEM, they come at you with both barrels.
This story is being covered ONLY because the press is pissed.
|
CrazyOrangeCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-13-06 08:29 PM
Response to Original message |
1. hope they stay good and pissed . . . n/t |
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-13-06 08:29 PM
Response to Original message |
2. His big mistake is thinking he's omnipotent; he's not, and |
|
not too popular to boot. The mouthpieces are going for the jugular tonight, and it's a joy to see!
|
Carla in Ca
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-13-06 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Doesn't help that he left the WH meeting |
|
with Annan before the press was allowed in either. Trying to dodge the bullet, Cheney?
|
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-13-06 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. I hope he's not getting 'heart' palpatations over this, |
Carla in Ca
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-13-06 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. I hope he's staying 'upbeat' |
|
regarding his victim's prognosis. ;)
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-13-06 08:37 PM
Response to Original message |
4. The worst in a long line of insults. |
sendero
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-13-06 09:46 PM
Response to Original message |
|
... I thought the press was completely controlled by wingnuts. What's going on?
Hint: the press loves a juicy story that will attract viewers. Repubs did one on accident this time, usually they are on purpose.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 09th 2024, 12:22 AM
Response to Original message |