Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Big Tobacco Recruited Scientific /Medical Experts/Shills Re:2nd Hand Smoke

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 10:58 PM
Original message
Big Tobacco Recruited Scientific /Medical Experts/Shills Re:2nd Hand Smoke
Edited on Thu Feb-16-06 10:59 PM by cryingshame
and the same shit will be happening with Big Junk Food Corporations who knowingly ladden our food supply with addictive and toxic CRAP.


from the British Medical Journal- how "the tobacco industry recruited and managed an international network of more than 80 scientific and medical experts in Europe, Asia, and elsewhere in a bid to avoid regulations on secondhand smoke." The study cited, "The tobacco industry's worldwide ETS consultants project: European and Asian components," was actually published in the European Journal of Public Health in August, but I can't find any reference in the popular press.


The BMJ reports that "consultants on environmental tobacco smoke ... were paid and managed by US lawyers working for the industry, and one of the aims of the programme was to enlist consultants who were prepared to publish research supporting the industry’s position that secondhand smoke was not dangerous and that ventilation provided a solution." In one year alone, 1991, the program's budget was $3.3m (£1.9m, €2.8m).


"The objective of the program was to influence policy makers, media and the public by providing, through their consultants … information concerning public workplace regulation, indoor air quality and ventilation standards, and scientific claims regarding secondhand smoke," without this information appearing to have been procured by the tobacco industry, says the report. The consultants carried out these activities by publishing scientific papers and reports, attending conferences, and lobbying. The authors say that the industry’s role was not disclosed to the public or was minimised or obscured when it was mentioned.

The program, begun in 1987, "by 1989 ... included consultants from the United Kingdom, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Finland, and Sweden. It also spread to Asia, and the report says that every member of the organising committee of an international conference on indoor air quality in Bangkok in 1991 was a tobacco industry consultant."


As of early 2004, no document has been located indicating that the program has been terminated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. The tobacco thing is one a messed-up deal...
But if you have a problem with junk food, don't eat it. Addictive? I'm not buying that. I can't think of a single piece of junk food I can't bypass if I so decide...

Well, except maybe cheesecake. Can't resist good cheesecake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Shouldn't Junk Food At Least Be Labelled If It Contains Additives/Ingredie
that cause addiction, obesity, diabetes, high blood pressure, cancer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It could be, but I think it's pretty obvious...
What amazes me, and has for some time, is why some bright folks haven't started a line of "healthy" junk food...adding vitamins and minerals to chips and such like they do with cereal. I mean, why not?

Nearly all our food has additives these days. Anything pre-packaged, certainly. Most of our meats as well. Most grain products have trace amounts of insecticides and rat crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. there are loads of healthy, organic and nutricious snack- in Whole Food
stores and the tiny sections some grocers have for whole foods.

Some taste better then others.

NOte: if you've been eating oreos, the chemical/hyper-sweet taste is both addictive and deadening. If you eat oreos regular, a whole food alternative sweetened with rice syrup or barley malt will not taste good or even sweet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I'm not buying the addictive argument.
Maybe it's because I can only handle so much of that stuff myself before I just don't want any more. I think food addictions of any kind are more mental than physiological.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC