IF that is what Dick was talking about.
Interesting.
From Newshounds-they watch Fox so you don't have to.
http://www.newshounds.us/2006/02/16/napolitano_weighs_in_on_vicepresidents_authority_to_declassify_information.php#moreNapolitano (JAN) explained that there are two categories of classified information, that which the Congress has made classified and which Congress has made it a crime to reveal, and that which the present president or any of his predecessors has classified . In the second case, the president can declassify what (s)he or his/her predecessors has classified, or delegate to the vice-president or a group of advisors to declassify same, but none of them can declassify what Congress has classified.
Bush has (sic) signed a "very lengthy, well-reasoned, detailed" executive order that lays out specifically what his advisors and Cheney may declassify. Whether he's done it (declassified material) or not is another story.
Gibson asked if that explained why (if) Cheney told Scooter Libby that he could reveal that Joe Wilson's wife was a covert CIA agent?
No, said JAN, because the identity of undercover federal agents is in the category of information that Congress has classified. No one but Congress could declassify that.
JAN goes on to say that there is still some wiggle room: Cheney could still say that it wasn't he who sent Wilson to Niger, it was that CIA agent, his wife, because "the nature of what agents do would fall under the president's power to keep secret or not to keep secret. It is only who the agents truly are that the Congress has made a crime to reveal. So there is wiggle room here. But the VP in his own inimitable way just teased us with it last night! I would love to know what he's talking about!"