Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The "free press" is dead.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 08:43 AM
Original message
The "free press" is dead.
Let me be the first today to pronounce them dead as a doorknob. They could not inform the American people even if they wanted. Because, if there are a few dedicated reporters and journalists that wishes to tell the truth, they are immediately co-opted and discounted by the counter-propaganda machine. The only difference between the two is that one wishes to tell the people the truth and the other wishes to spin propaganda for political and economic advantage. So it's the perfect balance - fair and balanced. The truth is never permitted to surface.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. Now WE are the free press.
NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burning Water Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Ain't it the truth.
I think the Internet is the way the truth will be distributed in the future. Keep letting the American people see the difference between the Dems and the Repukes, between the progressives and the conservatives, between right and wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. The one good result of the total corporatization of big media...
... is that independent and alternative media tend to flourish when that happens. And thank goodness for the 'Net.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gizmo1979 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. Woodward on Larry King would
not say the corruption had over taken government,but Bernstein said it corruption ran government that government was broke and had become a plutocarcy.Woodward thought this was funny and laughed.Woodward doesn't see himself as part of the problem he still thinks he's a reporter,but what he really is is a propaganda tool for the Bush administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
concerned citizen23 Donating Member (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. Read this research paper and you'll understand
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. Repeat after me....
There is no reporting on TV....

There is no Journalism on TV...

All that is on TV is a good, or at least pleasant looking person reading the AP news...

Or, a camera following something that moves......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. "A camera following something that moves..."
That about sums up the fable news networks.

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Pretty much....
Point and shoot....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
8. Was there ever a 'free press'?
Doubtful that this 'concept' ever was fully realized to begin with...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
10. No it's not
It's just moved to a new location.

WE ARE THE FREE PRESS.

No one ever dreamed that there would be an army of activists working to bring the truth to the world 24/7 and doing it for FREE.

That's why they can't stop us and we will be their downfall. They never expected that people would do this for no money or fame. It's beyond their comprehension.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harry S Truman Donating Member (300 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
11. Mindless press
Even where there is some commitment to real news, it is pushed away by the relentless chase of all things mindless. How can election reform get on the front pages when newspapers can't get enough of "teen" stores, "American Idol" and "buy this new gadget"?

TV died long before than in a wash of commcercialism and emptyheaded reporting. Think national news sucks? Watch local news - it is by far much worse - nothing but weather sports and the latest housefire and traffic tie-up.

America the stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. It is not mindless
It is an extremely will organized propaganda machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joey Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
13. At least Helen Thomas is still kicking
When she goes, we've lost everything........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SnookieDog Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
14. Not good for us.
At least when most of the major networks and newspapers were trying to play down the middle, most mainstream Americans got thier news straight. Since the pubes began their jihad against the majors, with the goal of trying to move people to the internet and talk shows for their main news source, fewer people are watching the network news or reading the newspapers. In my opinion, that is why the pubes are getting better at getting "their message out". Before Rush, Hannity, Fox, et al, their was no slanted coverage so people got the truth and the pube talking points never got off the ground. Now, too many impressionable people are getting biased reporting form the right, and are drinking the wingnut coolaid . . . by the gallon. I liked it much better the way it was when the press was truly free of bias.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC