The Vice Prick caught in another lie:
Evaluating Cheney's Claim Of Unilateral Authority to Declassify Information
By Lee Russ, Section OpEd
Posted on Sat Feb 18, 2006 at 07:47:46 AM EST
Snip...
A piece over at The Washington Note got me thinking about that claim, so I took a read through the Executive order which Bushites cite as giving Cheney automatic authority to unilaterally declassify info, Executive Order 13292, from March 25, 2003
Snip...
Only Part 3 deals with declassifying info once it has been categorized as classified. I read it and, as someone with legal training, I have to say it does not appear to give the vice president anything like unilateral declassification authority. Unless I missed something, for the White House to make that claim, it will have to employ the same kind of tortured analysis it uses to claim that the Joint Resolution authorizing military force against Iraq includes the authority to conduct domestic spying.
Snip...
(a) Did the info leaked by Libby "originate" with the President or Vice President? If not--if it originated with a fed agency, for example--then it should only be declassified through the mandatory declassification review process. Since the info we're talking about is from the National Intelligence Estimate, it seems unlikely that this information would "originate" with the Vice President or the President; it originates with the various security agencies.
(b) If the info is exempt from mandatory declassification review because it did originate with the President or Vice President, how can it be declassified given that the exec order does not specify how? On this one, I submit that it makes absolutely no sense for the Vice President to have unilateral power to declassify "de facto" by simply disclosing the info. That would set up a system where the Vice President's decision to declassify is unknown to anyone else, even the President, and certainly unknown to any other federal agencies which might be aware of reasons not to declassify specific info. That is not only nonsensical, but contrary to the obvious concern exhibited in the exec order that declassification of info that be done carefully, with opportunity for people who understand the implications to voice objections and concerns.
more...
http://watchingthewatchers.org/story/2006/2/18/74746/4869