Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Evaluating Cheney's Claim Of Unilateral Authority to Declassify Info.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 11:33 AM
Original message
Evaluating Cheney's Claim Of Unilateral Authority to Declassify Info.
The Vice Prick caught in another lie:

Evaluating Cheney's Claim Of Unilateral Authority to Declassify Information



By Lee Russ, Section OpEd
Posted on Sat Feb 18, 2006 at 07:47:46 AM EST

Snip...

A piece over at The Washington Note got me thinking about that claim, so I took a read through the Executive order which Bushites cite as giving Cheney automatic authority to unilaterally declassify info, Executive Order 13292, from March 25, 2003

Snip...

Only Part 3 deals with declassifying info once it has been categorized as classified. I read it and, as someone with legal training, I have to say it does not appear to give the vice president anything like unilateral declassification authority. Unless I missed something, for the White House to make that claim, it will have to employ the same kind of tortured analysis it uses to claim that the Joint Resolution authorizing military force against Iraq includes the authority to conduct domestic spying.

Snip...

(a) Did the info leaked by Libby "originate" with the President or Vice President? If not--if it originated with a fed agency, for example--then it should only be declassified through the mandatory declassification review process. Since the info we're talking about is from the National Intelligence Estimate, it seems unlikely that this information would "originate" with the Vice President or the President; it originates with the various security agencies.

(b) If the info is exempt from mandatory declassification review because it did originate with the President or Vice President, how can it be declassified given that the exec order does not specify how? On this one, I submit that it makes absolutely no sense for the Vice President to have unilateral power to declassify "de facto" by simply disclosing the info. That would set up a system where the Vice President's decision to declassify is unknown to anyone else, even the President, and certainly unknown to any other federal agencies which might be aware of reasons not to declassify specific info. That is not only nonsensical, but contrary to the obvious concern exhibited in the exec order that declassification of info that be done carefully, with opportunity for people who understand the implications to voice objections and concerns.

more...

http://watchingthewatchers.org/story/2006/2/18/74746/4869
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Dick Cheney: The Man and the Mission (NPR article)
Edited on Sat Feb-18-06 11:50 AM by ProSense
Watching Washington
By Ron Elving

Dick Cheney: The Man and the Mission


NPR.org, February 17, 2006

Snip...

More recently, the Bush administration has raised warning flags with its efforts to discredit war critics tied to the State Department or the CIA (the Valerie Plame affair), and again with its efforts to wiretap domestic calls originating with suspected terrorists overseas (the National Security Agency's eavesdropping program). Cheney says such activities are plainly within the president's rights -- even his duties.

In the one interview Cheney has given about his hunting accident, he also mentioned to Fox News anchor Brit Hume that the vice president has the power to declassify documents. He referred to an executive order, signed the month of the Iraqi invasion, which extends to Cheney the presidential power to classify information.

Whether that extends to declassifying is far less clear, and Cheney immediately refused to say whether he had declassified any information unilaterally. But here again, Cheney presented this executive assumption of major authorities long thought to be delimited by law almost casually -- as if it were obvious to anyone.

Snip...

But here is where the game gets more difficult. If there is a long-lasting effect from the riot of interest in Cheney's wayward shotgun blast, it may be a heightened awareness of Cheney himself. He has prospered by operating offstage, and that may well be harder to do now. If Cheney has drawn too much attention to himself, people are likely to ask more questions about what he and the rest of the Bush team have been up to -- and plan to do next.

more....

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5222879
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. it is beyond the realm of reality that WH/VP classified Plame as an agent
Edited on Sat Feb-18-06 11:52 AM by wordpix2
on a specified CIA mission. Darth suggested he/WH declassified the info, which probably originated with CIA, when WH or VP's office is not originating agency, therefore breaking (another) law.

Darth is telling a tall tale to the American sheeple who usually don't bother reading such laws, even when they're called into question, to make his actions look perfectly fine and legal. He ought to be impeached on this alone, not to mention his hideous fraudulent war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yup! Throw this on the pile of impeachable offenses. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC