Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This is why I'm an Independent

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dolo amber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:30 PM
Original message
This is why I'm an Independent
Edited on Mon Feb-20-06 09:45 PM by dolo amber
This is the DEMOCRATIC Party's flyer from the election of 1868:



Y'know, *if* Wes was once a Republican, and CLEARLY what was is what shall ever be...have fun in your racist party. :hi:

edit: In re: the first 894,725 posts in this thread: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=2468490
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Huh?
If you're saying Dems are racist, please note the flyer's date.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magrittes Pipe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Yesterday, people in GD were saying that they'd never vote Clark...
...because he "used to be a Republican."

If what used to be the case is always the case... you get the drift.

It's called sarcasm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Thanks nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Clark was NEVER a republican, he was an Independant until becoming
a Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. You are judging an entire party based on a position
from 138 years ago?????

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. 1868
I don't think that stands any longer and those who had that attitude are long gone. Anyone who still believes that should be run out of town.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. What?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sorry, but I'm old school
Ours is the party of Thomas Jefferson, and he freakin' rocks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magrittes Pipe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Thomas Jefferson owned 250 slaves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. Check your history books...
Property owners in Jefferson's neck of the woods were required by law to own slaves, IIRC. Didn't he try to free his, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magrittes Pipe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Do you believe the contention of Sally Hemmings' heirs?
If so, Thomas Jefferson also raped his slaves.

NO sex between OWNER and PROPERTY can ever be truly consensual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Dogma can be a tricky thing...
And yes, I've seen some of the Hennings heirs. I think they have a claim.

Don't try to make this about sex - you know that FReepers will always bring up JFK and Marilyn Monroe, Clinton and Monica, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magrittes Pipe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Ah, but it's not.
Fault can be found with everyone. Jefferson has a lot good to be said about him. He also had a hell of a lot of faults.

The biggest difference (okay, I'm greatly simplifying here) between the Federalists and the Jeffersonian Republicans was that the Federalists supported a strong federal government, while the Republicans wanted the majority of the power to be in the hands of the states.

Just like the Democrats during the Civil War. Just like today's Republican party.

Dogma IS a tricky thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. The DNA tests showed that

SOME male in the Jefferson family had fathered Sally Hemmings' children.

There is no way to establish conclusively that the father was Thomas Jefferson. There is also, obviously, no way to establish conclusively that Thomas Jefferson was not the father.

The case has been discussed a lot in genealogy forums.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #20
40. Why is that?
Why can no sex between slave and master ever be consensual? Sally was half-sister to Jefferson's deceased wife, Martha. Is it impossible to think that they could have had an actual affection for each other?

Sex could also have been consensual between the two as a bargaining tool as Sally was a house slave which afforded her and her children better working conditions and living quarters.

To the best of my knowledge, not even the Hemings family alludes that Jefferson raped Sally.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #19
39. Required by law to own slaves?
I'm curious about this. Can you post a link so that I can look into it further? Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. MLK was a democrat
So was Rosa Parks. That's good enough for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gr8dane_daddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Racist party?
We only need to look back a few months for racist remarks by dubya's mommy, not something posted in the late 1800s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varkam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Barbara Bush has a set of brass balls.
She showed them off pretty well too, when talking about the citizens displaced by Katrina.

'They're all underprivileged anyway, so this is working out pretty well for them.' and 'The scary thing is that I'm hearing they all want to stay here.'

She has to get her pants custom tailored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flaminbats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
30. Why did MLK remain active in the Democratic party?
In June of 1960, Dr. King announced plans for picketing both the Republican and Democratic National Conventions. He even personally met with Vice President Nixon, Eisenhower, and JFK during the 1960 election. He was a Democrat in Georgia, but I doubt he was a supporter of Marvin Griffin, Ernest Vandiver, or of the county unit system.

But Dr. King knew that blacks in the south couldn't gain equality by remaining isolated within the Republican party. The only way minorities would have a powerful enough national voice to end segregation would be to bring the battle into the Democratic Party. Southern whites like Richard Russell, George Wallace, and Herman Talmadge held power by attacking their opponents as black Republicans. The worst fear of these white politicians..blacks would join the Democratic party, this is why they rabidly defended white primaries in the south. Dr. King understood that voting in the Republican primaries in the south was a waste of time, and a lasting difference could only be made by becoming a force within the majority party.

Southern Republicans would love for minorities and white liberals to remain isolated within the Democratic party. But what happens when people like me have had enough of wasting our votes in the Democratic primaries, what will happen if we decide that conservatives can't have a monopoly on the Republican party..that we can also run candidates and vote in the Republican primaries!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ashamed_American Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. So uhhh.
Wow. You know, I'm not even gonna try this one.


www.blackeyedsundays.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. Actually the people that were the democratic party of 1868 are now the
puke party base. These were the southern democrats that Johnson knew he was giving to the pukes in 1964 when he signed the anti discrimination laws. They started leaving the democratic party and joining with the Hoover pukes, 1964 was just the end of the change over. As far as independents go, well what can we liberals say, it was the independents that helped bring King George into power, live with that little fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolo amber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Which is exactly my point
Things, and people, change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. except independents , apparently
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Susang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #16
33. Meaning what, exactly?
Your point, if you have one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. So are you an Independent or a Democrat?
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. not really
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
22. You're an Ind. because of that? Wow, are *you* completely fucked up!
Good luck with that historical strawman non-sequitur horseshit! :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magrittes Pipe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Good luck with reading the thread!
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #24
37. Sorry, I was trying to be as overblown as the premise.
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
25. LOL, nobody in the thread appears to be getting your point.
But you knew that would happen. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magrittes Pipe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. She just laughed and laughed and laughed...
...when she got the idea to post this. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolo amber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Half the fun of posting in this forum
is being clever, eh? ;) :D :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Susang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #29
34. It used to be
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #25
42. I get it
Edited on Tue Feb-21-06 09:40 AM by JNelson6563
but I guess one needs to agree with the motive to fully appreciate its' "cleverness", even the self-proclaimed kind. :eyes:

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
27. Used-To-Be's Don't Count Any More, They Just Lay On The Floor...
... 'til we sweep them away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
31. you really need a history lesson
The Democratic party was a conservative party until the 1920s. FDR turned it into a progressive party. 1868 isn't too relevant. But nice try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 04:53 AM
Response to Reply #31
36. I know that most Black Folks voted Republican (Lincoln's party)
Until FDR--That would be the late 30s.

Martin Luther King Jr. was not as much a Democrat
as he was a Black man speaking for the oppressed against racism.

Most of his speeches were about the status of the "Negro" in these United States.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elshiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
32. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Susang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
35. You are a naughty little troublemaker
I hope you're proud of yourself. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
38. ROFLMAO!!
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
41. No, THIS is just another
Clark thread in disguise. I hate my time being wasted. <Flush>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickinSTL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
43. maybe you should have used a sarcasm smiley
clearly, people aren't getting it :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC