Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AEI slaps Paul Pillar in the LATimes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 09:24 AM
Original message
AEI slaps Paul Pillar in the LATimes
It's no secret: The CIA plays politics
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-pletka21feb21,0,2183736.story?coll=la-news-comment-opinions

"GALLONS OF ink have been spilled since 2003 about how the Bush administration ignored internal predictions of post-war instability, terrorism and rising Islamism in Iraq. Intelligence, critics argue, was "cherry-picked" to bolster the argument for war. What much of the public doesn't realize is that the CIA's Monday-morning quarterbacks, who originated many of the complaints, are themselves handpicking intelligence to boost their antiwar cause.

This is a well-trodden road, littered with bitter treatises and interviews from ex-spooks and hangers-on such as Michael Scheuer, the "anonymous" author of "Imperial Hubris," and former Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV and his ex-CIA wife, Valerie Plame. The latest offering comes from Paul Pillar, a former CIA deputy counterterrorism chief, in the March/April issue of Foreign Affairs.

But Pillar, while rehashing every myth about the run-up to the Iraq war (and adding a few new ones), inadvertently lays bare a rarely discussed Washington truth: that the CIA itself is a political organization. Far from being manipulated by policymakers within the Bush administration (as Pillar alleges), it is the agency that has regularly and aggressively used its intelligence gathering and analysis to bolster preformed political opinions about hot-button issues from the Cold War to Iran's nuclear weapons program.

Prevailing CIA views shine through in briefings to the U.S. government, in backgrounders to reporters and in the selective leaking of classified information. The agency recruits (and rejects) outside assets based on its own political priorities. And why not? In a town where even first-graders hold passionate political views, it seems hardly surprising that a player so integral to sensitive policymaking would too. The only shock about the politicization of the agency is that officials bother to deny it."

Snide attitude, much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. They're scared, Pillar must be on the right track
Notice there's not a word about the high-level purges of the CIA by Goss & co.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. And who commandeered the CIA in the 80s when Casey was appointed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. Danielle Pletka - not one of the biggest AEI cannons
But, she still has friends at the LAT, where she used to work as a writer in Israel.

Wikepedia:

Danielle Pletka (born June 12, 1963 in Melbourne, Australia) is the vice-president for Foreign and Defense Policy Studies at the American Enterprise Institute. Pletka researches topics related to the Middle East, South Asia, terrorism, and weapons proliferation, and is the AEI expert on Iraq. She was a senior professional staff member for Near East and South Asia with the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations from 1992 to 2002 — where she was a chief aide to Sen. Jesse Helms. Prior to working with the Senate committee she was a staff writer for Insight Magazine from 1987 to 1992 and an editorial assistant with the Los Angeles Times and Reuters, working in Jerusalem from 1984 to 1985.<1> (http://www.aei.org/scholars/scholarID.50/scholar.asp)

Pletka ranks as one of the early neo-conservatives, and is also an associate of Martin Indyk. Pletka has been at the forefront of the neocon war drumming against Iraq, and she has been a champion for Ahmad Chalabi <2> (http://www.newyorker.com/printable/?fact/040607fa_fact1).

Pletka is thought to be a likely candidate to serve as Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs in the second George W. Bush administration.

Professional History
Senior professional staff member for Near East and South Asia, U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, 1992-2002
Staff writer, Insight Magazine, 1987-1992
Editorial assistant, Los Angeles Times and Reuters, in Jerusalem, 1984-1985
Affiliations
Project for the New American Century – signatory to several PNAC statements
American Enterprise Institute
Committee on the Present Danger – Member <3> (http://www.ocnus.net/cgi-bin/exec/view.cgi?archive=52&num=13695)
Coalition for Democracy in Iran – Supporter <4> (http://www.c-d-i.org/supporters.shtml)
External References
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. As soon as I saw her name on the Op-Ed...
I recognized it from having seen her spinning away on Washington Journal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC