Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

some interesting things in the GAO report RE:CFIUS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 12:16 PM
Original message
some interesting things in the GAO report RE:CFIUS
http://www.gao.gov/htext/d05686.html
-snip-
Under the original Exon-Florio law, the President was obligated to
report to the Congress on the circumstances surrounding a presidential
decision only after prohibiting an acquisition. In response to concerns
about the lack of transparency in the Committee's process, in 1992
Congress passed the Byrd Amendment to Exon-Florio, requiring a report
to the Congress if the President makes any decision regarding a
proposed foreign acquisition.
-snip-
Under the statute, the President or the President's designee may make
an investigation to determine whether a foreign acquisition might
threaten the national security of the United States. Neither the
statute nor its implementing regulations define national security. This
permits a broad interpretation of the term. The statute does provide
factors to be considered in determining a threat to national security;
however, consideration of these factors is not mandatory. These factors
include the following:

* Domestic production needed for projected national defense
requirements.

* The capability and capacity of domestic industries to meet national
defense requirements, including the availability of human resources,
products, technology, materials, and other supplies and services.

* The control of domestic industries and commercial activity by foreign
citizens as it affects the capability and capacity of the United States
to meet the requirements of national security.

* The potential effects of the proposed or pending transaction on sales
of military goods, equipment, or technology to any country identified
under applicable law as (a) supporting terrorism or (b) a country of
concern for missile proliferation or the proliferation of chemical and
biological weapons.

* The potential effects of the proposed or pending transaction on U.S.
international technological leadership in areas affecting national
security.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC