Flabbergasted
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-23-06 05:12 PM
Original message |
Will Congress overide a presidential Veto? |
|
Edited on Thu Feb-23-06 05:14 PM by Flabbergasted
This seems like a perfect example of a situation where congress overiding a presidential veto may be likely. There is more than enough outrage and incentive for congress to overide a Bush Veto on Port Regulation as well as enough votes. Could be interesting!
|
John Q. Citizen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-23-06 05:19 PM
Response to Original message |
1. bush is now saying maybe a 45 day investigation would be OK. n/t |
Flabbergasted
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-23-06 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. And if things aren't hunky dorry? |
John Q. Citizen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-23-06 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. Well he said he would veto any delay, but it appears he's backing |
Double T
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-23-06 05:25 PM
Response to Original message |
3. After bushco gets through with the arm twisting, threats, backroom..... |
|
deals, further deception and spinning like no one has ever seen, the port deal will be passed in the middle of the night, despite the raucous from the opposition to this deal.
|
Kerry fan
(351 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-23-06 05:34 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Why were there NO republicans at the briefing today, except for Warner, the chairman? Is something a little smelly in this?
|
MichiganVote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-23-06 05:38 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Congress? What Congress? All I see are a bunch of corporate kiss up's |
kentuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-23-06 07:07 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:29 PM
Response to Original message |