Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Former Sen. Birch Bayh Joins Coalition to Abolish Electoral College

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 06:21 PM
Original message
Former Sen. Birch Bayh Joins Coalition to Abolish Electoral College
Edited on Thu Feb-23-06 06:43 PM by radio4progressives
(edited subject table for mistaken identity)

Former congressmen press changes in presidential elections

BY JEFF ZELENY
Chicago Tribune



A coalition of former congressmen is launching a campaign to change how Americans select their president by reforming the Electoral College system, saying campaigns for the White House should be reliant on the nationwide popular vote rather than simply the outcome in a handful of swing states.

The bipartisan group plans to announce its proposal Thursday and begin a state-by-state effort to amend the Electoral College so the winner reflects the view of the country instead of an individual state or two with a close vote on Election Day. The plan would seek to eliminate the possibility of a candidate winning the popular vote but losing the election, as happened to former Vice President Al Gore in 2000.

"The time is long past to not play Electoral College roulette every four years," former Sen. Birch Bayh, D-Ind., said in an interview. "It is a throwback to 1887."

(snip)

cont...

http://www.centredaily.com/mld/centredaily/news/nation/13936431.htm?template=contentModules/printstory.jsp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good for Bayh. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Old Bayh, not young Bayh. Not Evan Bayh, Birch Bayh - Evan's father. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. LOL. You're right! Totally missed that.
I was surprised that Evan could do something I liked. My instincts were correct. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. "It is a throwback to 1887."
Edited on Thu Feb-23-06 06:27 PM by Ignacio Upton
Gotta get your history right there Evan, it was 1787. I also agree that the EC is archiac. Defenders argue that the EC is needed to give small states a voice in choosing the President, but unless you are in a swing state, your vote is already being taken for granted if you live in Wyoming or Idaho. Also, electors supposedly representing the interests of "the states" merely symbolically cast their ballot in accordance to the wishes of the popular vote in their states. I think that we should go for direct popular vote with some form of Instant Runoff Voting to avoid a Nader-type of situation. If we can't do this, then we could write a constitutional amendment that requires each state to award its electoral votes to different candidates in proportion to their share of the popular vote in that state (Colorado tried this in 2004 with its Amendment 36 intitative, but it was defeated on the arguement that Colorado would be less competetive in the EC with other states still having winner-take-all.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I remember, Salazbar lobbied heavily against it.. ..
that was freaking weird, (imo). good catch on the historical date..

yeah, probably irv would be implemented, i would think. though some are arguing that there are better, more transparent, and less subject to rigging than irv system.. i'm not an expert - though i have seen how it works and it is a bit convuluted - but still far superior to the system we have in place now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Not Evan Bayh, Birch Bayh - Evan's father. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's his dad, Former Senator Birch Bayh, not him
This would enormously help the Democrats. We have all the urban areas and would then switch to campaigning at least a large part of the time in states that are our base. One regret I have is not going to PA to see Kerry during the 2004 campaign - the CSPAN rallies looked amazing.

I did see him when he came to help Corzine - he was spell binding and because my husband and I were early we were able to see and hear him speak to people afterwards - he was spellbinding when he spoke and afterwards it was clear that he was a genuinely nice guy - surprisingly soft spoken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
17. Birch Bayh wasa among the first to oppose the war in Vietnam
He was everything his useless son Evan could never be: a real Democrat with cojones!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flaminbats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Evan should consider what makes him a political force..
it wasn't just name recognition, but the lasting impact his father's political will had on voters! Anderson and Bayh are political heroes for me..two reasons I am not a Republican. If Anderson was welcomed as a candidate in the 2008 Republican primaries, I would probably reconsider. ;)

Democrats could transform this into a winning national issue. what do we have to lose..Congress, the White House? :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. I went to IU from 1968 -1972 (where I had until then lived since birth)
Birch Bayh was a really good Senator. I had really hoped he would be President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. I saw it this a.m...and Gore Vidal in his latest book says Do Away With It
I've resisted all these years...thinking that it was important that "small states" retain their importance.

But after watching three corrupted elections and knowing that most of America will vote because of "Hava Act" on more corrupted machines...I think it's TIME FOR CHANGE.

Let the Popular Vote be the one that's counted. Get rid of these "Super Delegates" who seem to be controlling our States Voting...which contributes to Gerrymandering Districts (a la Tom DeLay in Texas and in many of our states) and after all...WHY SHOULDN'T states with big populations be counted?

My only worry is that it would swing things to the SUN BELT...where the population has increased hugely...But...Why not TRY IT? We could always go back to the "old way?" :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. The Major populations centers are West Coast/East Coast
and state capitals. If everyone knew their votes were actually COUNTED, that might dramatically change voter turnout results.

nothing can be as bad as it is now... we do need to drop it asap.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. Get rid of the electoral vote and get rid of e-voting. NOW!
No matter how we do away with the electoral college, as long as electronic voting is here, we still wont have fair and balanced elections. Get rid of both of them now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. yes i agree - we need to fix three things at once...
clean money campaigns, paper ballots only, and abolish EC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. You should edit the title to clarify which Bayh. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. thanks, my bad... not usually that sloppy.. (mortification at work)
i fixed it ... (sheesh, can't believe i did that)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. 's okay...you caught it in time, no harm done.
:-)

I think this is a pretty cool idea anyway. And maybe some current officeholders will get on board if it starts to look like it's going somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I'm hip...
a few months ago, i caught segment on C-Span featuring a republican pr person who wrote a book arguing against abolishing the Electoral college system - she was from texas (i don't remember her name or the title of the book right now)and the "minority rights" was used as the basis of her argument .. clearly abolish EC movement has been underway and gaining more and more popularity. so they've got their counter movement along with their talking points down pat.

I've been pushing for DU folks to get behind this, and posted a few times - it was met a lot of opposition - which strikes me as really strange, because the logic of it enourmously helping Democrats should be obvious to anyone serious about making sure the Democrats win the white house ever again. (apart from the nailing elections rigging, paper ballots and clean money).

It's logical, and it's necessary. DU needs to kick this in gear instead of wasting time on polling and debating their favorite candidate for '08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pushed To The Left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
16. Good for him!
One person, one vote. Every vote should count! It seems like common sense to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
18. Reform the electoral college?
Amend it?

I don't know what good that would do.

They need to either get rid of it or not.

What good would reforming it do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. it takes a constitutional amendment to abolish it, and
to replace the EC elections method process with a different method.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thatsrightimirish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
22. He's only doing that
BEcause he knows it would be a major battle for his son to win his home state. Senator Bayh would have a much better chance in 2008 or 12 in a popular vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dtotire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Voting Rights for ALL Citizens
We should not only abolish the EC, but we should extent suffrage to All citizens--including those living in territories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
24. Get rid of the EC to ensure that smaller states are NEVER considered
in the presidential campaigns.

CA, NY, FLA and TX will be visited, only the high population centers will ever see a candidate leaving smaller states to wonder if they are even considered in the process. New York City alone has almost three times the people in it as the entire state of Iowa. Thankfully Iowa has seven electoral votes so we at least get one or maybe two visits by the candidates during the campaign. How many visits does Montana get w/it's three? If we went to popular vote only about 40 states would be regularly ignored and tossed aside, not a great plan IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
25. difficult to change ec
repubs very afraid of the huge numbers of "liberal urban voters".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC