Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reid says Bush administration's 'incompetence' will aid Democrats

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 08:09 PM
Original message
Reid says Bush administration's 'incompetence' will aid Democrats
Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid said Friday that if midterm elections were held today Democrats would win the five seats they need to draw even in the Senate, due largely to the Bush administration's "general incompetence" at home and abroad. "This is an administration that is going to be noted for its incompetence not its accomplishments," Reid, D-Nev., said after a forum on Medicare reforms at the University of Nevada's School of Medicine. Reid said polls show Democrats winning Republican-held seats in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Montana, Missouri and Rhode Island.

"And we have good shots in Arizona and Tennessee," he said. "If elections were held today, we'd pick up five seats. The Senate would be 50-50. " Reid told about 100 faculty members, students and community leaders that the administration's prescription drug program for Medicare is intended to do away with Medicare altogether. "It's aim is to give HMOs and other health care plans out there the advantage," he said.

The administration has caused the number of uninsured Americans to increase by more than 1 million a year under its watch, Reid said. "The poor are getting poorer, the rich getting richer, the middle class is being squeezed. And this deals not only with health care, but with everything," Reid told The Associated Press. It includes "the dismal state of what is going on with the incompetence of this administration as it relates to the war, as it relates to (hurricane) Katrina, as it relates to the Medicare fiasco, as it relates to the port security problem evident today."

"The American people are now not looking at these issues one by one. They are just looking at generally an incompetent administration," he said. Reid said President Bush's budget priorities are "scary." "We're spending in Iraq $2 billion a week yet we're cutting these programs that mean so much to so many people," he said. "President Bush's budget calls for more than $35 billion in cuts in Medicare over five years and more than $17 billion in cuts in Medicaid. This is the poorest of the poor," he said. "The president's answer is health savings accounts. But you have to have money to have savings. It only helps those who have money and don't need the help as much as others."

more
http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/nevada/2006/feb/24/022410415.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, great. Let's depend on incompetence
to win.


Why am I not impressed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. i dunno about that...
Edited on Fri Feb-24-06 08:18 PM by Tiggeroshii
I just looked at Rasmussen -sure they're Republican, but so are the machines. I figure if they dead on with the presidentialelection, they'll be more accurate than others in the next elections, assuming that diebold doesn't buy out all the states beforehand. Then they'll be right for all Repugs and wrong for all the Dems. They are, after all, still a polling company accurate within 10 points.

Accroding to Rasmussen though, we'll probably win about 4 seats so far.... These are Michigan, Missouri, Montana and maybe even Virginia and Rhode Island(I say four because at least one of those is probably gonna turn).

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/2006/State%20Polls/February%202006/Virginia%20Senate%20February.htm

edited with link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheVirginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Michigan is already our seat (Stabenow)
I doubt Virginia will turn, but Santorum is on his way out as well.

You can't just look at what seats the Dems will pick up, though, because some of our seats are vulnerable as well, including Maryland, Washington, and New Jersey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. According to Zogby and Rasmsussen,
Edited on Sat Feb-25-06 07:51 PM by Tiggeroshii
...we're leading in Maryland by nearly 15 points now and have gained a small lead in New Jersey. I have a feeling this has something to do with Menendez's recent outspokenness on the ports issue- being against Bush and all. Jersey is A Dem state and Dems really don't like Bush. If somebody speaks very critically of him, they'll appeal.

New Jersey Senate- Menendez small lead(25% uncommited-Ras)

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/2006/State%20Polls/February%202006/New%20Jersey%20Senate%20February.htm

Menendez small lead(4%) zogby poll

http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1072

Maryland Senate-Cardin 14% lead RAS

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/2006/State%20Polls/February%202006/Maryland%20Senator%20February.htm

Report on Maryland polling-http://www.zogby.com/search/ReadClips.dbm?ID=12562
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jayhawk Lib Donating Member (587 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. With Bush's incompetence
we should have it made through the next 2 election cycles at least. It is really looking good for 2006 and in 2008 to take back the Whitehouse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC