Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sean Hannity's interview with Albert Gonzales..annotated smileys edition

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 07:49 AM
Original message
Sean Hannity's interview with Albert Gonzales..annotated smileys edition


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,185948,00.html

HANNITY: Mr. Attorney General, good to see you.

ALBERTO GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL: Good to see you, Sean.



HANNITY: We appreciate you being here. Let's start with the ports issue. It's gotten a lot of news. You were on the Committee on Foreign Investment, part of the vetting process. There's been a lot of controversy over this, even within Republican circles. Is there anything to be concerned about? Tell us about that vetting process.

GONZALES: Well, it's a very thorough vetting process that we're required to go through, in connection with acquisition of a U.S. company by a foreign company or by a foreign country that may impact in an adverse way the national security of our country.



The Department of Justice is a member of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States. We have 30 days to do our own independent review and see whether or not we should raise an objection to the transaction going forward. And so the department, like the other members of the committee, did our own independent assessment and made the determination that we had no reasons to raise an objection to this transaction going forward. We, all of us, have as our objective to ensure that our national security is not impaired in any way by this transaction.



These transactions, we had 60 that were approved by CFIUS last year, something like 50 the year before. So this is not something that is unusual or rare. We engage in these kind of evaluations all the time. And we're very careful in evaluating this transaction.



I think part of the problem is that a lot of people don't have information about the parties involved, about the transaction, about the security measures that are going to be imposed in connection with this transaction. And I'm hopeful that, as we get more information out to the public and the Congress, that people will become more reassured about this transaction.



HANNITY: Let's talk about that, because I think the question a lot of people have is, is 30 days long enough? This committee was first formed and created in 1988. It formally has only rejected one of 1,530 transactions in that time. What do you say to the critics who say, in that sense, it seems rubber-stampish?

GONZALES: I would say it's not rubber-stampish. We take this responsibility extremely seriously. The reason why there is such a high approval rate is because we do work with the parties. And to the extent that we have concerns, we seek assurances from the parties. The parties make certain representations, certain agreements to the United States government that assures us that the national security of this country will not be compromised. And to the extent they can't give us those assurances, from the parties, the transaction doesn't go forward. And so, again, always the focus on ensuring that the national security of this country is protected.



For more fun with Sean and Alberto, visit Fox News...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wake.up.america Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Attorney General goes to Sean H.'s show . Not much class for...
either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. the man has the face of a liar.
Edited on Sat Feb-25-06 08:31 AM by flordehinojos
it is easy for him to accommodate facts in order to meet his own ends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. Have you heard Jim's (Stephanie Miller voice guy)
impression of Gonzales. It really captures the creepy essence of the man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. No, I'll have to check it out...
Gonzales' voice definitely has that creepy, sort of Peter Lorre edge to it.



:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoilinfor2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yup, you nailed it!
(even though I must confess that I dearly loved Peter Lorre and miss his wonderful talent)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC