"Safe" or "Dangerous" Mr. President??

[SHRED]

1) This world is so dangerous that we are not safe unless an agent or computer are listening to our phone calls, via a warrant-less wiretap.

2) This world is so safe that we can give control of our key entry points to a state-owned company where the people hate us and the government may have been accomplice in 9/11.

Reconcile these two points Mr. President, and the minority who support him.

--------------------------

Credit goes to "Barak And Roll" for this post idea:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=2482332&mesg_id=2482403

[Quakerfriend]

1. That's perfect! Let's spread it around.

:applause:

[SHRED]

4. I have been!

[marmar]

2. Left is right, up is down, blue is grey...

in Bush's America. This nightmare has got to end sooner or later....

:(

[Inland]

3. You know the answer:

It's dangerous if Bush isn't in charge. It's safe as long as everyone does as he says.

Simple, and with no connection to reality, but it's the answer Bush would give.

[UrbScotty]

5. Good thought. K&R (nt)

[Canuckistanian]

6. This world is so dangerous

That citizens are put on no-fly lists...

Librarians are harassed...

People are arrested for clothing that they wear...

Military and government whistleblowers are ignored or persecuted...

Oh, sure, those were "errors". But it can be forgiven that at least those "errors" were all on the side of "caution".

Where the fuck is that caution now?

:grr: :grr: :grr: :grr: