Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Young Army Officers leaving service in large numbers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 09:15 AM
Original message
Young Army Officers leaving service in large numbers
Edited on Mon Apr-10-06 09:17 AM by BOSSHOG
Not only are retired Generals bitching about the lack of leadership and competence from the White House but Junior Officers are baling at the first opportunity.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/10/washington/10army.html?th&emc=th

Would some flag waving conservative please jump in here and explain this to me. Maybe the NY Times is just making it up. Or maybe its Clinton's fault. Surely it couldn't be bush's fault, he's perfect in every way. Gas pushing 3 bucks a gallon and the future leaders of our Army are going away. Thanks "conservatives."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The White Tree Donating Member (630 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. So who's quitting and who'd staying.
I just got done reading this artocle on Yahoo's web page. It sounds a little slanted:

Army surpassing year's retention goal by 15%
<http://news.yahoo.com/s/usatoday/20060410/ts_usatoday/armysurpassingyearsretentiongoalby15>

Two of every three eligible soldiers continue to re-enlist, putting the Army, which has endured most of the fighting in Iraq, ahead of its annual goal.

The Army was 15% ahead of its re-enlistment goal of 34,668 for the first six months of fiscal year 2006, which ended March 31. More than 39,900 soldiers had re-enlisted, according to figures scheduled to be released today by the Army.

The Army has met or exceeded its goals for retention for the past five years, records show. It was 8% over its goal for 2005, and 7% ahead of its targets for 2004. The number of re-enlistments has exceeded the Army's goal by a larger margin each year since 2001.

The last paragraph is kind of interesting in relation to your post:

The Army accounts for age when it accepts soldiers for re-enlistment, Hilferty says. While the Army has fewer privates and more specialists than in the past, he says, the age structure is balanced. "We're aware of it, and we're considering it."

It is all very confusing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Enlisted Personnel in the Army
are reenlisting but Junior Officers are not maintaining the retention rate needed to ensure senior leadership in the future (per NYT article.) More than the Army would like are leaving after their initial commitment. Continuous combat duty could do that to a young Captain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I'm really curious about the junior noncom retention rate.
If those folks start to bail, the Army's in the hurt locker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Hey Sarge
Back to back to back combat tours can really be a great motivator to get out and it can definitely be tracked back to leadership or lack thereof on the civilian side of the ledger. A Master Sergeant with 18 years can rationalize hanging around to hit that 20 year mark but a 20 year old Corporal with two purple hearts and orders back to Iraq has other thoughts in his head. Such a shame the PNACers of the world didn't take into consideration worse case scenarios.

Welcome aboard teammate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. GMTA, Boss
Yeah, an E-7 with a good shot at E-8 on the fourth hitch will probably hang in, but that Corporal looks around and sees E-6s at 19 years and holding, plus the spousal unit is getting difficult about the life, the motivation is, mmmmm, thin.

I'd also like to see a breakdown of the MOSs what are staying or splitting.

Boss, the PNACers are so far up Denial they've just past the Third Cataract. Anyway we all know that grunts are just kleenex, plenty more where they came from.

Good to be here; so, when does the Club open?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Retention=Reup or get Stop Lossed
The enlisted personnel are probably where most of the re-enlistments are coming from, most are staying in because of the great employment opportunities offered by the Bush economics program.

But, retention only means that the numbers stay the same, besides, how many were given the option of re-enlisting or being Stop Lossed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPZenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. Leaving to Run for Congress as Dems
Yes, they are leaving to run for Congress at Democrats.

www.murphy06.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddy Waters Guitar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
8. Yeah, and Bush and GOP in Congress cutting vet benefits
Edited on Mon Apr-10-06 11:55 AM by Muddy Waters Guitar
Bushco people are happy to wave the flag when they think it will get them extra "cannon fodder" for the war in Iraq. But when it comes time to actually support the people who've given so much for our country, Bush and his colleagues are at the forefront of cutting indispensible veterans' benefits. No wonder so many of our best and brightest prospects are leaving the military-- they sense, rightly, that they'll be shafted in spite of their service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. Bush has beaten the ground pounders to death.
I can't imagine what it's like for these guys who have gotten deployed 3 and 4 times, often with less than a year in between. The havoc on their wives, their children must be horrific.

And for what?

I'm not surprised younger officers are bailing out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. The havoc ....
Edited on Mon Apr-10-06 04:00 PM by sarge43
I was a teacher's aide at our local elementary. The father of one of the boys in our class was deployed for a second time. The kid had a near nervous breakdown from stress and fear.

For what?

Greed and power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. and for a pissant like Bush, who hid out in the Guard, and bailed on that
That guy told the Reserves "FU" and took off. He knew he wasn't going to get called up, and if so, he would not be flying, by his refusal to undergo the physical.

Anyone else would have found his ass in Vietnam or Greenland or maybe Guam, serving out his years on active duty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Wake Island is where I would have dropped his ass
Three miles long, half mile wide, the Club is a shack with a curtain door and the only females for a thousand miles are the Gooney birds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Guam. The snakes. He's afraid of everything.
I'm sure they'd drive him crazy.

He could get drunk on Wake, but on Guam, if he gets too drunk, THE SNAKES WILL COME GET HIM!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Nah, Wake
"I was a butter bar, sent to Wake Island, made morale officer and then the bastards lost both my pay and personnel records."

We have vays of dealing with you.

But I do like the snakes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
12. I'm with ya on this one, BOSSHOG
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2561318

There's real toruble right here in River City (or is it Baghdad on the Potomac?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. Who can blame them
While Zumwalt got weird and trashed the uniform at least we knew there some semblance of leadership at the top. How would you guys have liked it if a presidential draft dodger was ignoring top brass and making all the decisions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
17. Those young officers are at the end of their 5-year obligation, correct?
The 5-year service obligation after OCS, ROTC, or the service academy?

:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 06:15 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Would assume so
The Army wouldn't let go of them otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC