Should Ed Schultz's covering up on Flight 77 on 911 be moved to 911 forum?

[zulchzulu]

I posted a thread about how Ed Schultz said that a couple people who supposedly saw the Flight 77 plane fly by them on September 11 emailed him during a break today...and how I thought it was pretty incredulous that such a thing was viable...it would be highly unlikely that the few people who saw such a phantom plane would also just so happen to be listening to his show AND to email him during a half-hour period with their "verification"...and the thread was quickly moved to the cob-web ghosttown 911 forum...

Can we discuss this issue which happened today here on the more fresh forum than have the subject buried in the muck? This event happened today and while it relates to 911, it is more about how the real story is being covered up.

[Flabbergasted]

1. No I wondered about that as well!

[zulchzulu]

2. The chance of those people emaling him within an hour is very suspect

Why would he even mention that they emailed him during such a short timeframe?

[global1]

3. Every Cab Driver In D.C. Saw The Plane Go Into The Pentagon....

I get to D.C. at least once a year. I make it a point to engage cab drivers in a discussion about 9/11. Every cab driver I've talked to in the last three years and that is about 15 to 17 drivers - said that they saw the plane crash into the Pentagon.

Cracks me up.

[orleans]

4. i heard that part of his show today too

along with the caller who brought up 9/11

ed kept saying shit like: i'm not ready to go there.

(okay ed, ole boy, you just let us know when you're ready)

the caller asks for just another minute
ed says he'll give him thirty seconds (big of you)
then he interrupts the caller and accuses the caller of filibustering.
then he hangs up on the caller--and it was probably less than thirty seconds. (ed, did you LIE?)

and within a minute or so he gets these emails from people who saw the plane. SO THERE!

well, then i guess it must be true! (he dismisses the whole story/topic and moves to disprove it with "emails" of folks who are saying what ed believes.

(ed, what if i told you one of those emails you got was from me? and i was LYING TO YOU?? either that or i'm lying to you now, ed. better get your truth meter out so you can tell for sure)

i'll say ed's not ready to go there. he's so eager to believe what someone tells him (example: the "official" story) that he's ready and willing to believe a couple emails with impeccable timing. dear ed, were you making up those emails?)

got news for you ed, i only listen to you because your show takes up space on my otherwise air america radio station in the car--a distraction, and mild annoyance until randi comes on

in answer to your question: No--it shouldn't be put in the 9/11 forum because the topic here is: ed schultz can be a real blabla sometimes. this is just another example of his blablaness.

[snowbear]

5. The guy who called him was a bit of a loonie tune if you ask me..

I'm just saying...

[orleans]

6. i think he was very passionate about his ideas on 9/11

and probably thrilled that he was given a little national air time to talk about it.

i think ed's complete dismissal with his dubious email bullshit--two people who emailed saying they saw the plane--was a bit fu*ked. how many people were there, or driving by, and how many of those happened to be listening to ed's show today, and then how many of those happened to be at their computers and able to send him off an email?

yeah, ed cares about truth so much he's willing to make up crap just to prove his "truth"

(besides, sounded to me like the caller had seen the video "loose change" and if you haven't seen it then i suggest you google it and have a looksee. it's fascinating)

[Moderator]

7. Locking

If you have a question about a moderator's decision,
please don't start a thread about it. Please contact
the Administrators.

Thank you.