Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Zogby final numbers for today, February 3, 2004...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 07:51 AM
Original message
Zogby final numbers for today, February 3, 2004...
http://zogby.com/news/index.cfm

South Carolina Final: Edwards 36%-Kerry 32%; Missouri Final: Kerry 56%-Edwards 17%; Oklahoma Final: Clark 31%-Kerry 29%-Edwards 26%; Arizona Final: Kerry 42%-Clark 28%- Dean 15% New Reuters/MSNBC/Zogby Poll Reveals

___________________________


Pollster John Zogby: "Edwards is ahead in South Carolina, but Kerry has shown he can run well in a southern state. The two candidates are in a dead heat in two regions, among Democrats, with men, and among union voters. Edwards pulls ahead with strength in the coastal area, among the youngest voters, college educated, and women. Kerry apparently wins among
African American voters. One potential fly in the ointment for Edwards: his margin here is due to solid cross-over appeal from Republicans and Independents. Will they really vote?

"Missouri is a victory for Kerry of enormous proportions and a further sign that he can run well in a diverse state.

"Oklahoma is very intriguing. If Clark holds on, and Edwards wins in South Carolina, then this race continues. But Kerry again has bragging rights for running strong in a state that is a little bit south, a little bit prairie, a little bit populist, and a little bit conservative. Edwards has really come on strong and if today's numbers hold, he is a strong regional candidate.

"A strong victory looms for Kerry in Arizona, with a very respectable showing for Clark. Could Clark translate this into western regional strength? And Dean has moved into delegate-counting position based on good numbers from young, suburban, and union voters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Any idea why Clark isn't polling better in SC?
I'm really surprised that Clark isn't polling as well in SC as he is in OK.
Has anyone offered an explanation or theory?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
isbister Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. I read something
somewhere recently speculating that Clark's pulling rank on Kerry really hurt him with vets. Don't know how true that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Odd that it's not hurting him in OK and AZ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquanut Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. Clarification:
"Clark's pulling rank on Kerry"

Should really be "The media's depiction of Clark pulling rank on Kerry".

Clark never pulled rank on Kerry in any real sense. This whole "story" is a media creation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. True, but Dole
got Clarks goat, and Clark will have to deal with that. On cable news these days stories can be made out of the slightest missteps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PAMod Donating Member (651 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. Clark is the anti-Dean, but is not the anti-anything else.
That doesn't explain his strong numbers in OK, but I think it is the main reason he has all but disappeared elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefta Dissenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #11
23. Clark is the anti-bush (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. total frigging blackout
by the media. John Edwards was on the front page of the STATE newspaper twice last week and local news coverage has been playing it up as a Kerry and Edwards horse race.

Clark spent more time here while the others were focused elsewhere but he's been treated like the invisible man. And sadly most people get their info from TV 'news' and that waste of ink and paper known as THE STATE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #17
26. Not an excure JK & JE were blacked out in Iowa and stormed it. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elb77 Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
30. two types
of candidates right now. establishment vs. non-establishment. all non-establishment candidates are competing for supporters so kerry soars. but i must say, i think this primary process is archaeic. we should be deciding on a nominee in the same fashion we choose a president. one primary, one day. this limits outside influence by the media, etc. iowa should not decide this whole process. my vote doesn't count anymore. and i, for one, find that very discouraging and disheartening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phelan Donating Member (188 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
39. The campaign in SC wasn't run as well as it should have been
Clark could have had the state locked up, but for some reason or another which I do not feel like I am at liberty to elaborate the campaign in the state failed the candidate.

Clark should be polling much better, and I actually think from personal canvassing experience he will do much better than expected from the polls. Unless a lot of people I've talked to over the last two weeks are dirty liars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
isbister Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. If these numbers hold true
maybe there's two anti-Kerry's left in the race???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. Today is indeed an exciting day!
:kick: :kick: :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. What About Howard Dean?
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MAlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. What about him
Stick a fork in him, He's DONE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zech Marquis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
7. wow, I didn't know OK was a 3 way tie
31-29-26 for Oklahoma? :wow: I didn't know Edwards was doing so well THERE. Kerry is doing extremely well in Missouri--that's the big prize today IMHO, and his message is playing well down south. And hat's off to Clark for being in such good shape in Oklahoma too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. surveyusa had Edwards 2 points behind Clark in Oklahoma yesterday
he's surging there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zech Marquis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
27. that would be HUGE!
and next week I get to vote in the VA primary :bounce: Oh I can't wait!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
9. Hopefully, we'll eventually see a two-person race
Either Kerry-Edwards or Kerry-Clark. Then it really gets interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shawmut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
10. looking down the road
Edited on Tue Feb-03-04 08:29 AM by slim
the schedule breaks in Kerry's favor. If Edwards is going to be a strong regional candidate he has the misfortune of having many southern state primaries come right on the heels of large numbers of states outside the south voting on the same day (re: this Saturday and Super tuesday). assuming Edwards wins in SC today, his Waterloo will come on Feb 10th when VA and TN vote. If he can't sweep both states then I don't know how he could go on any longer. Today and the 10th are critical for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Just around the corner....
Michigan, Washington and Maine. Saturday.

We'll know a lot more after that than we will after today.

Just my .0125

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annxburns Donating Member (948 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
12. My two cents ....
.... I really do think it is breaking down to this.

President: John Kerry
Vice-President: John Edwards
Sec of Defense: Wes Clark

Kerry and Edwards will have strong regional balance.
During the campaign, Edwards will emphasize economic fairness and pound W on domestic issues.
During the campaign, Clark will campaign for Kerry and Edwards and keep pounding W on his failures in Iraq.

Dems win the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toronto Ron Donating Member (429 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. Make that Sec of State for Clark
Sec of Defense goes to a civilian (rumsfeld, cohen, etc.). I don't think Clark would be interested in that anyway. He would make the ideal Sec of State (assuming the media continues to succeed in wrecking his presidential bid).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cindyw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. Is that a rule or a tradition?
I wanted to point out that Kerry enjoyed a virtual media blackout before Iowa. It benefited him actually. Clark will find he gets more attention if he wins at least one state. It would be beneficial to the party as a whole even if he is not the eventual nominee. His raised stature would almost guaruntee a cabinet position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #22
34. I think it's the law. Al Haig shot down SecDef rumors in 1980 b/c of this
As I recall he was saying there was a statute limitation on former military officers serving as secretaries over the armed forces. It's a 20th century law, however, since I know US Grant was Secretary of War under Andrew Johnson for a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ishoutandscream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #18
33. With you, Ron, on this one
I'm a Clark supporter, but wouldn't mind seeing a scenario such as this. I think it's unbeatable (yes, I've been very upbeat lately).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. sounds about right
Kerry needs strong 2nds or close 3rds in SC and OK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
20. Wow how things have changed.
Today, instead of being worried that Kerry might not win, Kerry supporters are worried that he might not win everywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
21. Correction: Kerry has shown he can run well in the Southern PRIMARY
Zogby is an idiot. Kerry's second place standing in the South Carolina poll doesn't give us any indication as to whether Kerry can compete in the South. John Edwards is the ONLY candidate in the field who has actually won an ELECTION -- not a primary -- in the South.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King of New Orleans Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. Haw Edwards won an election outside NC?
Since, Edwards is the only one to have run in an election in the South he's the only one who could have won an election in the South. Has Edwards won an election in the North, or the Midwest, or the West where about 70% of the electoral votes are?

It should be noted that even if Edwards won the nomination S.C. would probably be very low on his list of target states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. Southern nominees have done well outside the South
I don't think anyone doubts that Edwards would carry Massachusetts in the general election. But who honestly thinks Kerry would have a shot of carrying North Carolina?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. I think you missed your chance to argue that, dolstein.
It looks like Sen. Kerry has a chance at a sweep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. I believe
That when Dolstein says Kerry doesn't have chance at winning NC he is referring to the general election, not the primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnyawl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. And Edwards has only won ONE election

in the south. Funny he isn't running for reelection.

We needed someone like Bob Graham to do well. A southerner who's had a career of winning elections in the south.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katieforeman Donating Member (785 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. Experience makes a politician less electable not more!
Candidates like Kerry and Graham with long careers in politics leave long voting records and many public statements for Republicans to use against them. Don't you think Kerry's history in the Senate of voting to cut defense and intelligence spending will hurt him in the general election? Don't you think his vote againat the first Iraq war and for the second makes him look like a politician who follows not leads public opinion?

Ask the voters in California if they voted for ARNOLD SCHWARZENNAGER because of his extensive experience or his ability to win elections in the past.

John Edwards is the one who will beat Bush because he connects with people and they trust him and like him. That's what Democrats need to win elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. Welcome to DU, katieforeman and King of New Orleans!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King of New Orleans Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. BTW--thanks for the welcomes
Arnold is in way over his head. This ain't the 90s when any former cast member of Predator gould be governor and watch the money flow into state coffers.

Quite frankly, I think experience will count alot in this election especially when you're going up against an incompetent child like GWB.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
37. More shameless spin from Zogby
Will Kerry just hire him before he really makes an ass of himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k_blagburn Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Zogby Not Reliable
Thats why many dont use them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC