Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rumsfeld: "thousands and thousands of generals and admirals..."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 04:20 PM
Original message
Rumsfeld: "thousands and thousands of generals and admirals..."
This is what he said: there are thousands and thousands of generals and admirals who haven't spoken out. THERE AREN'T THAT MANY!

(This clip also poo-poos dissent as only coming from "two", instead of the six.)

How many active "generals and admirals" are there? Surely there aren't THAT many. Does this not show the man as flouting statistics? For fun, doesn't it also show him as unable--or unwilling--to represent reality? Someone with this lack of grasp of reality certainly shouldn't be holding the reins of power, should he?

"Thousands and thousands" was the term. Nobody calls him on it. Why?

It would also be fun to find out just how many officers of this grade in the Army, Air Force, Marine Corps (part of the Navy) and the Navy there really are. He makes a grandiose dismissal like this that can't have any basis in fact, and somehow it gets a pass.

How many are there? The intimation is that it's those still active. If not, it can't be any others than those recently active, since the tacit subject is those who would have a reasonable say.

What are the numbers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. We hardly even have that many field-officers, let alone flag officers
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bill Bennett said there are 8000 generals!
is he out of GA yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LA lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. here is what I found 3100-6300
Edited on Tue Apr-18-06 04:25 PM by LA lady
Not all of the Armed Services keep easily accessible records of their retired officers. The Marine Corps has online biographies for 400 retired generals (of all ranks). According to the Department of Defense, the Marine Corps has 82 generals on active duty. The Air Force keeps a partial list of online biographies, which includes 86 retired generals. There are 13 active-duty generals in the Air Force.

The Explainer used the ratios above to estimate the number of retired generals in the other military branches. The Army—which currently has 312 generals—should have between 1,100 and 2,200 retired generals. According to the Army's press office, the number is about 1,700

By the same logic, there are probably between 750 and 1,500 retired admirals in the Navy and between 1,000 and 2,000 retired generals (of all ranks) in the Air Force. In total, then, you might expect somewhere between 3,100 and 6,300 retired generals and admirals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Humm? These figure don't seem to reflect what Rummy states.
Doesn't appear to get close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Yes, but the intimation is that these are recently retired or active ones
It's just crap. It's just the same old bluff and bluster that goes unquestioned by the corporate media. There simply aren't "thousands and thousands of generals and admirals" who choose to not speak out. Many still living are long since retired, and simply don't pass the tacit test he's applying; to add up the rest who are either serving or recently retired (and thus privy to the pertinent events) one can hardly scrape up myriads of thousands who stand by the strutting little asshole from moneyville.

Thousands and thousands. Why isn't this guy called into account for his aggressive fiction? We nick him here and there for getting this or that wrong, but he puffs up and bullies with his tiresome self-indulgent rhetorical questions that he asks himself and answers with such gloating dismissal of the peons who might disagree. He is the epitome of the raging and unquenchable greedhead on a quest to subjugate all as inferiors.

What crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Dismissal and Disrespectful
Rummy has gotten by with these tactics from day one. Pure arrogance and lack of respect for the american people. Why should he treat the military any different?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe he should do an anonymous poll then?
Maybe the media should.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well, I hope they rise to the challenge and speak up!
However, active duty military risk losing everything if they criticize the leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. The West Point Cadets spoke out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 06:06 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. I missed that.
When did that come out?

It's mind boggling thinking about all the experts that have denounced the Decider over the past couple years:

Professors Emeritas of Economics
Professors of American History
Constitutional scholars
Physicians, scientists, teachers, environmentalists, human rights watchdogs, religious leaders....

It seems like the whole country is against Junior, and yet he sits there, never held accountable by the only people that can stop him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
20. Maybe a military coup?
It seems to work in other Banana Republics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's a good point.
This man is so used to saying just about anything, that he's become delusional. I truly believe that.

He feels that if he says something often enough, it becomes true. At least in his own mind. Time to get the men in their white coats....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. Is this the same "thousands" that Condoleeza Rice used to talk
Edited on Tue Apr-18-06 04:58 PM by mcscajun
about the "errors" made in Iraq, and then backpedaled like crazy on?

Interesting grasp of mathematics these Bushites have. Emphasis on SHITES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. somebody here looked it up in the US Census: 853 Generals
or thereabouts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jai4WKC08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. That's the number on active duty n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northofdenali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
11. Straight from the horse's moutn (US Army, that is) as of 2004:
Active-Duty by Grade
Number Percent
Commissioned Officer 68,634 13.9%
Warrant 12,142 2.4%
Enlisted 413,515 83.7%

http://www.armyg1.army.mil/hr/Demographics.asp

The site does not break the Commissioned Officer figure out by rank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Roosevelt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. Yes, there are thousands...BUT
the important points to remember are these:

1. the number of generals who held command in Iraq is very very small

2. these 5-6 of these revolting generals were top commanders in the war
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
16. I think Rumsfeld included the ones buried in national cemeteries
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
17. thousands and thousands of generals and admirals
He probably learned to count from Katherine Harris.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
18. I think Uncle Don's getting carried away with this Chisenbop thing.
Edited on Tue Apr-18-06 10:34 PM by Old Crusoe
(It's Korean finger math. Not sure if that's how to spell it.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC