Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Picking at Scabs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 11:18 AM
Original message
Picking at Scabs
I was listening to a report on the new "Spanish Anthem" on teevee. In another day and another time, I could surely see that hailed as a wonderful, uniting gesture. Today, in this climate, it is being vilified as somehow supportive of 'illegal' brown people. Why did the people who started this movement toward a Spanish language version of the national anthem come to do this? Was it because they felt like it? Or was it in response to what some can justifieably percieve as an outright, all out assault on **them** ... as people and as a people? A scab was picked (people illegally crossing our borders) and it started to bleed (The Minutemen). Issue = reaction = reactionary reaction = escalation = dishonest debate = divisive campaign issue.

How did we get to this point?

Its quite simple, really.

Picking at Scabs.

There are two sides to every issue, and at least two ways to spin anything. And then there's the one thing that's always missing. The truth. And the truth always lies between the poles that oppose each other.

Look back to 9/11. A shared national tragedy that affected us all. An event that brought most of us together. In the time since then, we could have continued to use it as a rallying point to increase national unity. But that is simply not what happened. The constant scare tactics of the cabal have been, in effect, scab picking. 9/11, as an icon, could just as easily have been 'spun' for the betterment of all of us. Think of a few possible new intiatives that could have been rooted in a positive use of the 9/11 icon. Energy indenpence to wean us from mideast oil - and thereby a reduction in our 'interest' in the region. It could have been used a way to enhance our growing friendship with other nations instead of creating more enemies - boith real and strawman. It could have served as a way to put some reason into our policy vis a vis Israel. But what was the plan of the cabal with repect to 9/11?

Picking at scabs.

I don't know - or even know of - one single person, not one, who is at war with Christianity. To be sure, I myself would do whatever it takes to smack down the Talibornagains, but they're not Christianity, really. Who do you know who wishes to abolish Christmas or take a shotgun to the Easter Bunny? But instead of acknowledging this and starting a serious dialogue, we get "The Passion of the Christ" and a national debate on the role of Christ in American life. We revisit prayer in schools and nativities on the town square. But there was no serious, **intellectually honest* debate. Instead we had ..... what, exactly?

Picking at scabs.

There is, quite likely, not a person in the world who does not know and care about at least one real, live, breathing, sentient, gay person. While they may, indeed, not know a paricular person is gay, they do, in fact, still know at least one - and probably many more. But rather than accept them as just people, what do we debate? The 'sanctity of marriage'? That's a strawman debate and everyone engaged in it knows it is. They absolutely know it. But what keeps happening? Instead of an honest discussion, we get what?

Picking at scabs.

Our side is not immune to this, either. There are scabs we tend to pick, too. Just recently we're seeing a debate on the 'role' of atheists. Why would they have any different 'role' than anyone else? More to the point, why is anyone on our side willing to acknowledge and accept a person's right to maintain a personal set of core beliefs (some might call that 'religion') and still say there's no place for an athiest. It is simply intellectually dishonest. It is in fact ....

Picking at scabs.

Instead of picking at scabs, what our country - in fact, the entire world - needs is intellectually honest dialogue. One of the reasons I'm a democrat is that I find we, as a group, are far more intellectually honest than Republicans. We're more willing to discuss things, both as a way to understand and as a way to resolve conflict.

Unfortunately, there's one tactic, employed artfully by the other side, that never fails to produce results.

Picking at scabs.

Can someone **please** pass the balm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. You have got to start a DU Journal and post these gems.
You are such a good writer!

Start a blog or a DU Journal today.

I mean it, damn it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Thank you for that compliment
And I do have a journal .... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well put Husb2Sparkly. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. Very late night self-kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC