Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Latest Dirty Political Trick - WikiRoving

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Brazenly Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 06:55 AM
Original message
Latest Dirty Political Trick - WikiRoving
Reposted from Brazenly Liberal Blog

Democratic Senator Robert Byrd has been WikiRoved. So has Democratic Rep Jim Marshall.

It's the latest - and arguably the most juvenile - trick to come out of the GOP's bottomless bag. So contemptibly childish, it needs a new word. We hereby coin "WikiRove."

WikiRove (v)
To stain or attempt to ridicule, defame, or destroy the reputation of by altering one's Wikipedia entry; "Capitol Hill staffers have WikiRoved Robert Byrd."


Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia that can be altered by anyone with a computer, has proved remarkably useful for pulling political dirty tricks.

Political operatives are covertly rewriting — or defacing — candidates' biographical entries to make the boss look good or the opponent look ridiculous.

As a result, political campaigns are monitoring the Web site more closely than ever this election year.

Revisions made by Capitol Hill staffers became so frequent and disruptive earlier this year that Wikipedia temporarily blocked access to the site from some congressional Internet addresses. The pranks included bumping up the age of the Senate's oldest member, West Virginia's Robert Byrd, from 88 to 180, and giving crude names to other lawmakers.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060428/ap_on_el_ge/wikipedia_politics;_ylt=AgTR2VhwcnbkIDh7rlf3oB2yFz4D;_ylu=X3oDMTA5aHJvMDdwBHNlYwN5bmNhdA--

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. pretty childish all around
All this will do is eliminate widipedia as a useful source.
I guess the rule is, "What can't be abused, must be destroyed."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'm of the opinion that the Republican party heavily recruits from
college campuses. Frat boys grow up thinking that rules are meant to be broken. And when you're doubly immune to criminal prosecution because (A) you have someone in your fraternity with ties to the GOP; and, (b) you're a young white male, well, no wonder we have the environment we have today. To many people played it over the edge and got away with it. Each time they did, it raised the bar for the next guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brazenly Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Here's one indication of just how right you may be
Edited on Sat Apr-29-06 07:32 AM by brazenlyliberal
Lawmaker Chided for Going to Frat Party

WASHINGTON - Republican Rep. John Sweeney's attendance at a beer-drinking, college fraternity party has drawn criticism from Democrats who accused the New York lawmaker of using poor judgment.

"What is a 50-year-old congressman doing at a frat party at 1 in the morning cavorting with students 30 years his junior? Teaching them how a bill becomes a law?" Blake Zeff, a spokesman for New York Democrats, said Friday.

Sweeney stopped by the Alpha Delta Phi party at Union College in Schenectady, N.Y., late last Friday, a visit first reported by the college newspaper, the Concordiensis. The paper also printed a photo of the lawmaker posing with students. Local newspapers in the region posted similar photos online.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060428/ap_on_go_co/congressman_frat_party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. also business schools now teach that if breaking a law is cheaper
than complying, a "good" businessman breaks the law without thinking twice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamDon Donating Member (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Wikipedia is not a useful source
for anything political or historical in nature. The revisionists are rampant over there. Read this site: http://wikitruth.info/index.php?title=Main_Page
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seaglass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I have used it quite often and it is a useful source but not the sole
source.

It is the nature of the beast that when a source is open it is going to have flaws and complainers and cheerleaders.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is why I have never been able to completely trust Wikipedia.
It is a shame they cannot have a pre edit review.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllieB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. I agree. My nephew, who is a sophmore history major,
has caught many errors, some that are outside the political agenda also. I agree about some kind of a 'pre-edit' where the entry is purged of political opinion. It's disgusting that the wingnuts are using wiki as a propaganda tool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seaglass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. Wiki tracks them, take a look at this page...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_Staffer_Edits

The have tracked IP addresses to the House and Senate. Interesting stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brazenly Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Interesting - thanks for posting that!
From a quick scan, it looks like the questionable edits are not all Republican shenanigans, but largely so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seaglass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yeah it was front page news locally when Meehan's staff
made changes to his Wiki entry.

It would be nice if Wikipedia had some type of alert at the top of the page that the content had been recently edited but not verified so that users could feel comfortable that info was accurate and neutral.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wizdum Donating Member (531 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
11. Republicans imbeciles seem to forget that democrats have computers too
and this little prank can cut both ways. They are nothing more than treasonous hacks that have betrayed their country in more ways than one can count. This is just another example of their hatred of America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
12. Dem on Dem attacks also.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/04/26/cox.wikipedia/index.html
Snip>A Georgia gubernatorial candidate accepted the resignation of her campaign manager Wednesday after he was accused of changing the online Wikipedia biography of an opponent in the upcoming Democratic primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
14. DU was Wiki-Roved, too
But not by right wingnuts. I read an amazing thread over there that included my very own DU screen name that was an utter pack of lies claimed to have been based on information developed by a DU mod. It's pretty nutso there, but I did get to see that Wiki editors battle bravely to correct these wrong-headed attempts to defame. I actually gained in respect for the project as a result of this experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC