Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BREAKING NEWS: Broadcast flag is back (Stevens sneaks broadcast flag

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 08:52 AM
Original message
BREAKING NEWS: Broadcast flag is back (Stevens sneaks broadcast flag
bill into net neutrality bill! The repukes must have crapped their drawers yesterday when they saw almost a half a million downloads of Colbert's piece on Crooks and Liars!)

May 1, 2006

I just saw that Senator Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), the inspiration for our iPod campaign, introduced a Net Neutrality bill in the Senate today. Sen. Stevens took this oppertunity to slip the broadcast flag into the bill. From Multichannel:

According to a summary released by the Senate Commerce Committee, the Stevens bill would:
...
Authorize the FCC to establish a broadcast flag to allow TV stations to protect digital content from Internet piracy;There are lots of things going on in this bill, it's 135 pages, but any bill that enables the FCC to implement the Broadcast Flag must be stopped.

This is another tool in the arsenal of the Hollywood cartels. They are attempting to overwhelm the tech community by introducing terrible legislation after terrible legislation hoping that we don't notice or are spread too thin fighting their other bills. This comes right after IPPA (DMCA 2.0) in the House and Senator Feinstein's (D-Hollywood) PERFORM Act in the Senate.

more...

http://ipaction.org/blog/2006/05/breaking-news-broadcast-flag-is-back.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. How can they stop me if I put a videocamera on a tripod facing the TV?
Can their broadcast flag prevent me from taping what my television displays if I don't try to get it from TiVO or some other such means?

Yeah, and speeding in cars stopped after the introduction of the radar gun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julius Civitatus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. This bill aims to kill most video blogging (Crooks & Liars, CanOFun, etc)
Edited on Tue May-02-06 08:56 AM by Julius Civitatus
Even though there are serious questions regarding FAIR USE that are not contemplated by this new restriction to freedom of speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grottieyottie Donating Member (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Fair use most likely does not cover sites
That advertise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. i don't like the flag provisions, but Stevens didn't exactly "sneak" them
into the bill. They have their own subtitle in the bill. The summary released by his office describes them. There's no effort to hide what he's doing, he's just doing it.

onenote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. you are not helpless victims here
"...another tool in the arsenal of the Hollywood cartels." ?

what cartels are those, exactly, the people who design, create, PAY FOR and make things?

you are free to design, create, and make things yourself if you like, so that you can be free of those "cartels"
You are free to start your own movie company, tv company, broadcast company, technology company so you can get what
you want when and how you want it.
You are free to turn off your tv if you don't like what it brings and how it is regulated.


"the rich have got their channels in the bedrooms of the poor"

Msongs
www.msongs.com
batik & digital art
mugs and shirts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Betsy Ross Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. First post I have seen that comes close to supporting
copyright laws. Companies do put money in research, development, production, etc., and have a right to expectations of copyright protection and licensing fees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. This has to be KILLED!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC