Tom Hayden Sets the Record Straight on Kerry’s Iraq Plan
May 4th, 2006 @ 4:17 pm
Tom Hayden sets the record straight on recent distortions of John Kerry’s Iraq plan in the Huffington Post. Hayden issues a virtual smack down of columnist George packer, who Hayden says, “fixes the facts to suit the policy he favors.”
In this case, he cleverly alters Kerry’s proposal by leaving out the international summit Kerry has proposed to address peacekeeping, reconstruction and other issues concerning the transition to a post-war period. Kerry thus is categorized as an uncaring advocate of “out now”, unlike Packer who at least cares about the killing he seems to support forever.
Why would replacing US troops, clearly the primary cause of Iraqi nationalist attacks, with an international peacekeeping force from neutral countries increase the violence? There is no answer.
Packer sees the US troops not as occupiers, not the cause of violence, but as “buffers” between violent Iraqis. The same civilizing role was claimed by the British when they sent troops to Northern Ireland in 1969; thirty years later they signed the Good Friday Agreement but still haven’t permitted free elections. Baghdad is simply the next Belfast, in this view.
While distorting and dismissing Kerry for “finding his voice”, Packer applauds the recent op-ed by Leslie Gelb and Sen. Joe Biden calling for a devolved, tripartite Iraq - Kurdish, Sunni, and Shiite - with a weakened central government to assure the fair share of oil revenues and other matters. This is the longstanding preference of numerous neo-conservatives, and Israeli officials, to put an end to Arab nationalism. By redefining Iraqis along tribal, not national lines, by weakening the central state apparatus, a threat to stability would be removed from the Middle East.
{snip}
I had an email discussion with someone today about the various plans on the table for withdrawal from Iraq. I pointed out that to date, in my opinion, no plan is as strong as Kerry’s plan. Tom Hayden, who has never failed to mince his words about the war, totally gets that Kerry’s plan is the most sound plan on the table. Something Scott Ritter also told me last week.
David Broder mentioned Biden’s plan in the WaPo today, yet he failed to note that while Biden mentioned the idea of a Dayton accords like summit, that concept was first brought to the table by John Kerry in his OP/ED in the NY Times well ahead of Biden’s. Not to be picky here, but as Tom Hayden points out, it really would be great if journalists and columnists stopped fixing the facts to suit the policies they favor.
LINKS & MORE -
http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=2877