Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wall Street Interests at Odds with Middle Class and Working Interests?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
General Lee Donating Member (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 11:30 AM
Original message
Wall Street Interests at Odds with Middle Class and Working Interests?
The Wall Street crowd likes the fact that fewer jobs were created just so they can benefit in the smaller than expected interest rates!


Stocks Jump on Weak Payrolls

Dow spikes after news that the economy added 138,000 jobs last month, much lower than expected. Expectations for an interest-rate hike in June drop. Four Seasons and El Paso climb sharply on quarterly results.

The market rallied at midday as investors applauded tepid job growth in April, which cast doubt on whether the Federal Reserve would hike interest rates in June.

The Dow Jones industrials jumped 114 points, 1%, to 11,553. The Nasdaq composite gained 17 points, 0.7%, to 2,341 and the Standard & Poor's 500 index rose 11 points, 0.8%, to 1,323.

Cyclical stocks were especially strong, with Caterpillar (CAT, news, msgs), Boeing (BA, news, msgs) and Alcoa (AA, news, msgs) leading the Dow higher.

http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Investing/CNBC/Dispatch/060505markets2.aspx

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Grateful for Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Again, this comes as no surprise
I have seen stocks rise when there is news of huge layoffs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eliphaiku Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. You would think this would put the myth to rest
That market economies are good for providing goods and jobs. Of course that myth was easier for class enemies to maintain when it didn't take nearly an hour of minimum wage work to buy a gallon of gas.

I thinks loads of false consciousness will persist until this unjust economy crashes and people can see the system for what it really is, poorly compensated wage slavery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grateful for Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Unfortunately, I think you are right
It is going to take a catastrophe such as the collapse of our economy to expose the deceit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. short answer: yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. I disagree.
In the long-term, large corporations will have an awfully hard time maintaining earnings growth if they don't have a thriving middle class to buy their products and services. Policies aimed at strenghening the middle class indirectly support Wall Street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. And that's why they've been busy building a middle class in
China and India. They've moved the means of production and most of the capital, now it's just a matter of waiting for the life-style to take hold.

Mark my words, they are abandoning amerika. They've just about bled us dry and it's time to move to the next phase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. Please tell me you are not surprised....
This is why "Wall Street" hates Costco because their employees are paid a living wage and provided benefits. Those on Wall Street and in Washington would love it if slavery were made legal again. NO wages!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al122 Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. New Deal Reforms Have Postponed the Day of Reckoning for the Past 70 Years
The reason our economic system never approaches the same kind of crisis point it did in 1932 is that today we have an activist Federal Reserve, FDIC, unemployment insurance, Social Security's SSI component - all which were viciously opposed by the Milton Freidman types of that era. FDR himself was said to have remarked that he was the "best friend capitalism ever had."

That being said, the Bush administration and today's myriad "free market" boosters sure seem to be doing their best to finally bring what we have been taught to call capitalism to its knees. The exploding collective debt of this country (all forms of public and private)constitute the biggest financial bubble in its history (see Kevin Phillips new book "American Theocracy). Real estate values are completely out of whack with reality owing to the Fed's reckless loose money policy of 2001-04. Perhaps the greatest danger of all is the incredible amount of unsecured borrowing being done by the nation's largest banks, brokerage firms and hedge funds. In 1998, when the hedge fund, Long Term Capital Management was threatening to bring down the entire stock market when their unsecured bets went against them, Alan Greenspan immediately sprang into action and forced their lenders (Citibank et al) to keep them alfoat.

This country is in desperate need of a New, New Deal. The problem is that the people running it are either to greedy to see the danger or too stupid and preoccupied with the politics of religion to address our real problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demigoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. yes, so basing an economic policy on whether wal street is doing well
is stupid. However, if the economy is doing well, wall street can do well, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al122 Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Exactamundo
The strongest period of middle class growth in this country was not the unregulated 1920s but the, by today's standards, super-regulated, heavily unionized 1940s, 50s and 60s. Wall Street lagged in the 40s and 50s, in no small part due to the hangover from 1929-41 but did quite well in the 60s. We do need to recognize, however, that part of this post-war miracle had to do with the lack of serious international economic competition and part of it with enormous military spending. But there is no question that those years were better for average Americans than the credit fueled boom of the 1920s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. So to translate CNBC's reasoning into English:
Edited on Fri May-05-06 09:43 PM by Telly Savalas
The Street thought the economy will be strong because the Fed won't raise interest rates because the economy will be weak.

My analysis of today's market results:

The Dow Jones went up a percentage point because thousands of investors made specific decisions regarding specific stocks they were investing in, and in aggregate these decisions led to the Dow going up for the day.

But I'm part of the "lunatic fringe," so what do I know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. If you get most of your information from CNBC
Edited on Sat May-06-06 02:23 AM by TheWatcher
Then you don't know much, sad to say. Notthing personal against you, it's just that CNBC is a very poor avenue to get real information about what truly goes on.

You might start with the fact that 58-75% of most trading done on the Dow on a given day is Computer Program Trading. There is not much in the way of investing that goes on anymore. The Big Hedge Funds, The Fed with their OPMO's and their Coupon Passes, the big Money Center Banks and Trading Desks, also help put lipstick on this pig everyday.

This Market is about as artificial as it gets.

But then, you probably think I'm part of the lunatic fringe, so what do I know?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Try reading my post again.
Edited on Sat May-06-06 11:23 AM by Telly Savalas
CNBC is mentioned because it's what the original poster cited.

And in case you don't notice on the second reading, I was attacking CNBC's reasoning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. As always
Payroll is a business cost. Whenever there is a tight job market, it keeps wages down. That means more profits for the investors. It was exactly the same in the 80's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zookeeper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
15. Lately, it has seemed to me that there is a total disconnect...
between Wall Street and anyone who ISN'T part of the "Investor Class." Business and economics is one of my least favorite topics, so I'm no expert, but everytime I read about good news for investors and big business, the effect on middle and working class people is never part of the calculation.

It's as if they live in a parallel universe...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC