Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Excellent GOSS Stuff - HookerGate - Domestic Spying---CannonFire

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 05:02 PM
Original message
Excellent GOSS Stuff - HookerGate - Domestic Spying---CannonFire

Flags to small to hide behind

CannonFire broke the Wilkes scandal connections some time ago and didn't get full
credit. You can be sure that when he talks about Porter Goss' possible connection,
he has a good analytical eye. These three paragraphs are just too good not to show
here. The fourth is a bit chilling.


http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/

Now ask yourself: If incriminating photographs of Porter Goss exist, did they play a role in his being tapped for that august position at CIA? One is reminded of a quote attributed to LBJ: "I don't trust a man unless I have his pecker in my pocket."

Before Goss, Bush was bedeviled by DCI George Tenet, whose attitude toward the administration was Janus-faced: Tenet pled loyalty, yet the press kept printing leaks indicating that CIA analysts disagreed with the Administration's rationales for war. Bush, who values loyalty above all, presumed that he could rely on greater fealty from Porter Goss.

Blackmail photographs of Porter Goss partying with hookers would explain his ascent as well as his fall. But how would Bush's neocon handlers have known of such photos (presuming that they exist) unless the Wilkes/Wade operation had ties that went as high as the White House itself?

(Commenting on possible Goss successor in waiting, a Rummy pal, CannonFire says)

This is troubling. As we noted previously, Rumsfeld's Special Operations Command -- SOCOM -- stands poised to unleash Green Berets and Navy SEALS, both in foreign nations and domestically, after Big Wedding II. Special Forces will have authority to spy and to make arrests of U.S. citizens without warrant. If Calland becomes DCI, the civilian agency won't be in any position to hold the Special Forces in check -- indeed, CIA and SOCOM will work in tandem.

I'm already starting to miss Goss!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. As they say for a lot of such reports ........
"Still Developing" ..... "stay tunmed .... "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Yep, I get home and turn on the tube, Anderson Cooper for a story
and do I get the 15 farking "appropriating committee" Members of the House story. Nooooo...I get poor
Patrick Kennedy's car crash. Well, that is a story but we've heard it before and he needs and is seeking help.

WHAT ABOUT THE MEMBERS OF CONGRESS WHO TAKE A LIMO TO GET SOME AT THE WATERGATE THEN VOTE APPROPRIATIONS
FOR THE GUY GIVING THEM THE RIDE.

MSM IS GETTING WORSE BY THE MINUTE. I'M CONVINCED THAT THERE IS A GUERRILLA CAMPAIGN WITH IN MSM THAT'S
ACTUALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY NEGATIVE, I.E., TRUE NEWS ABOUT BUSH AND THE REST OF THEM, INCLUDING
COOPER, ARE STILL IN LOCK STEP WITH THIS MONSTROUS ADMINISTRATION. WONDER IF THEY'LL REPLAY WWE LATER TONIGHT...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. What is
Big Wedding II??????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. what's "Big Wedding II"
Is that Iran?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. a bit chilling?
You sir, are a master of the fine art of understatement...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. How do they get around the good lawyers, judges, advocates?
We've known what PNAC wants?

Can they really get it?

Is your kid or brother going to be their police?

How do they do it with just seals and berets.

We're not the size of Germany, Poland, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hm-m-m-m, I was just thinking this over on another thread
Edited on Fri May-05-06 05:41 PM by Peace Patriot
(an UnderstandingLife thread), that this is just what Rumsfeld wants, to discredit and disable the CIA. The job that Porter Goss was supposed to FINISH was the job that Rumsfeld, Cheney, Bush, Rice, Libby, Rove and WHIG started with the outing of Plame/Brewster-Jennings, purging anybody who still thinks that it's their job to prevent war, not to manufacture it. That was the story anyway. I also have felt all along that Rumsfeld was the mastermind behind Traitorgate (and the mastermind behind what Traitorgate may be covering up).

Anyway, if true, it's playing out as expected--that is, as Rumsfeld wants. The CIA headed by a frat party bozo, who is stupid enough to get caught with his pants down--discredits, downgrades the CIA, with some Dems in Congress happy to keep it degraded, while Rumsfeld proceeds with his black ops in Iran, with the internal opposition in disarray.

Yer right. Scary.

(In other words, Porter Goss was put in place BECAUSE they knew he was sleeze/dirty--just like Brown at FEMA. To destroy an agency.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. You last line is really scary...indicating a real intelligence behind this
They can't occupy Iraq but they can sure screw up this one. That would be serious chess, to put in
place a guy to do the dirty work knowing you could further that agenda by outing the guy and further
discredit the organization. Smart!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC