Most of the talk about the sudden downfall of Porter Goss as director of the CIA yesterday afternoon has centered around the tantalizing story of Goss' alleged involvement in an emerging congressional scandal involving lobbyists procuring prostitutes for members of the House Intelligence Committee and some CIA bigwigs at the Watergate in Washington.
We could be following the wrong scent. Some of the talk elsewhere since last night has centered around the idea that Goss lost a power struggle with John Negroponte. Negroponte is said to have complained that Goss is not a "team player."
Goss? Not a team player? A political hack like Goss is nothing if he is not a team player. My guess is he was playing for the wrong team.
The following report, which appeared Monday on
TomPaine.com, is very interesting:
Iran Intelligence War
By Robert ParryIn a replay of the Iraqi weapons of mass destruction charade, neoconservative supporters of George W. Bush are pushing the U.S. intelligence community to take a more alarmist view about Iran's nuclear program—only this time, the nation's top spy John Negroponte is resisting the pressure unlike former CIA chief George Tenet.
Tenet joined in Bush's hyping of the WMD evidence about Iraq—famously telling the President that the case was a "slam dunk." But Negroponte is defying hardliners who want a worst-case scenario on Iran's capabilities. Instead, he is citing Iran's limited progress in refining uranium and their use of a cascade of only 164 centrifuges.
"According to the experts that I consult, achieving—getting 164 centrifuges to work is still a long way from having the capacity to manufacture sufficient fissile material for a nuclear weapon," Negroponte said in an interview with NBC News on April 20.
"Our assessment is that the prospects of an Iranian weapon are still a number of years off, and probably into the next decade," said Negroponte, who was appointed last year as the Director of National Intelligence, a new post that supplanted the traditional primacy of the CIA director as the head of the U.S. intelligence community.
Read more at the link. While the rest of the Bushies are playing the same game in Iran as they did in Iraq and expect lies and distortions to work a second time, Negroponte is saying something else. One might conclude that it is Negroponte who is not the team player.
It's not Bush's team any more. Goss thought it was, but he found out too late that he was on Negroponte's team.
First, let's consider what Goss was supposed to do at the CIA, and did to some extent. He was supposed to weed out people who were "disloyal" to Bush. What that means is that Bush and Cheney didn't want analysts around who would tell them anything other than what they want to hear, regardless of the facts. They want to go to war against Saddam, they need a reason, then the analysts better get in line and give them that reason. If it turns out to be a lot of moonshine, they'd better take the fall for being "wrong." Goss' mission was to emaciate the CIA and make it sycophantic toward policymakers.
Enter John Negroponte. Negroponte is no angel. He has no problems with mass murder. He helped facilitate death squad activities in Central America during the Reagan years. However, it is entirely possible that he thinks that if one is going to do that kind of thing, one had better have good intelligence and not a CIA that thinks its duty is to tell the policymakers only what they want to hear.
Negroponte may be a thug, but he isn't a stupid thug. You can't just send death squads into villages and wipe out people unless you know that it's actually going to hurt the leftist guerrillas. Otherwise, you're just murdering people for a dubious purpose. To do that, Negroponte wants good intelligence. That means he wants professionalism at the CIA.
An emaciated CIA serves no useful purpose to anybody, except to really foolish tyrants who just want to extort oil from the Middle East by threatening to drop bombs on it. Look where that's gotten us. Even if we did needed to go to war against Iran, we couldn't do it. We're tied up in Iraq. We are tied up in Iraq for reasons that had nothing to do with national security because those stupid tyrants did not want to hear that it had nothing to do with national security.
Negroponte could be like Kissinger. Kissinger is a brilliant mind with no moral compass. Could you imagine Kissinger putting up with Porter Goss at the CIA? Not on your life. That could be what Negroponte is thinking.