Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House Fires Back At Kerry Over AWOL

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 06:11 PM
Original message
White House Fires Back At Kerry Over AWOL
Edited on Tue Feb-03-04 06:12 PM by DrFunkenstein
WASHINGTON - The White House and its Republican allies angrily denounced Democrats on Tuesday for suggesting President Bush had shirked Vietnam-era military service.

But the counterattacks gave fresh impetus to an issue Bush successfully fended off in the 2000 campaign, and they were unusual for a White House that tries to cast itself as being above the political fray.

Bush joined the Texas Air National Guard in 1968 and spent most of his service time based near Houston. In May 1972 he requested and received a three-month assignment with the Alabama National Guard so he could serve as political director on the Senate campaign of Winton "Red" Blount, a family friend.

Retired Gen. William Turnipseed, a commander at the base Bush was assigned to, has said he never saw Bush appear for duty. Bush, however, says he remembers meeting Turnipseed and performing drills at the base.

In 2000, The Associated Press reviewed nearly 200 pages of Bush's military records released by the National Guard Bureau in Arlington, Va. They contained no evidence that Bush reported for drills in Alabama.

Ari Fleischer, then a Bush campaign spokesman, quoted Bush as saying he did "paper shuffling" in Montgomery. "He thinks it was desk work," Fleischer said. Bush later left the Guard early to attend Harvard Business School.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=544&e=14&u=/ap/bush_military_service



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
molly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. He can't run - he can't hide!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
funky_bug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Disclaimer: Disgruntled response
How is it that Michael Moore fired the gun, Clark took the bullet, but Kerry somehow gets the medal?

Pardon me if that makes me vomit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Typical Kerry tactic.
Let someone else do the legwork, and then take credit when it becomes popular.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. It's all part of Kerry's Weathervane Campaign
Whichever way the wind is blowing, that's the direction he heads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Typical Kerry Smear (Try Reading The Article)
Kerry said Monday he could not judge whether Bush fulfilled his military commitment.

"It's not up to me to talk about them or to question them at this point," Kerry said in Arizona. "I don't even know what the facts are. But I think it's up to the president and the military to answer those questions."

That drew a sharp response from Marc Racicot, chairman of the Bush-Cheney re-election campaign.

"President Bush served honorably in the National Guard. He was honorably discharged," Racicot said. "To suggest, as Sen. Kerry has, that the military should answer questions about President Bush's honorable discharge is an outrage. The furtherance of these charges is despicable."

Some of the toughest criticism came from actor-director Michael Moore, who said Bush was "a deserter," and Democratic National Committee Chairman Terry McAuliffe, who said Bush was "AWOL" during the Vietnam conflict.

"Senator Kerry is supporting a slanderous attack on the President by refusing to repudiate" McAuliffe's assertion, Racicot said.

---------------------

Where does Kerry "take credit?" Why would you attack him - a Democrat - with absolutely no basis?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozone_man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Clark missed the golden opportunity in NH.
A risk for sure, especially when it has to be spontaneous in response to a debate question, but he could have nailed Bushed then and there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. looks like everyone is playing their role to perfection.
Kerry gets the medal because he didn't stand on stage with Michael Moore and have to deal with that political hot potato of "deserter". Clark is not polling badly because of that one stage moment. He just falls away as a viable alternative to Dean with Kerry surging. He was a DLC tool. Do you get that? Clark was there for one purpose only. To neutralize the Dean threat. He has done his job and can fade back to CNN soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windansea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. LOL how perfectly stated
perfect!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. SOP for Kerry...
...let someone else test the waters, then invite a camera crew for when you jump in...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. Sorry. Kerry brought it up in Nov. 2000 trying to help Gore.
Clark was noncommittal at the debate, and so was Kerry on Crossfire. They handled it right.

They let the issue brew. This was smart of both of them. The issue is still out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. He did it right
He just says he really doesn't know, Bush and the military need to explain where he was. He doesn't put himself right in the middle of the fray. Wes Clark wasn't savvy enough to make sure Moore used wording that would put the charge out there without sounding like a "left wing looney". Sorry, but this is just one more of those things that makes Kerry "electable". The ability to target Bush without sounding radical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
funky_bug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Give me a break!
Edited on Tue Feb-03-04 06:38 PM by Wife_of_a_Wes_Freak
Clark gave the same non-commital answer and got flamed for being "passive" and "not standing up to Bush."

This identical approach by Kerry does not make him a hero. When Clark was taking the heat, Kerry said, "It was over the top." Now he's taking credit for a comment that belongs to no one but Michael Moore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. No Clark didn't
He said Moore had a right to say what he wanted. That's it.

Kerry said he thought the word "deserter" was over the top. Diffuse shreaking rhetoric. But he didn't stop there. He ALSO said he really "didn't know" what happened and that Bush and the military would have to answer. Keep the controversy open.

He handled it better, he just did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
funky_bug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Yeah, okay
You tell yourself that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. I thought Clark handled it right.
I also think Kerry did. They let it brew and the issue is still out there. They're not stupid and they know when to let their campaign team do the stirring of the pot.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gottaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. What a joke
They're saying Kerry is "despicable" because he won't campaign for * -- they're flailing.

And that statement by McCain, all he did was say that he assumes * did his duty.

Flailing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
31. Surrogates will rip Bush on the AWOL issue. Kerry remains above the fray.
Edited on Tue Feb-03-04 09:27 PM by oasis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbfam4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. I rated it a 5
This story just won't die. The spinners will have to call coulter out to smear the dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kimber Scott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. What's funny is
how the right is trying to acuse the Democrats of saying that National Guard duty is not as important as regular service. They will never answer the question of his AWOL directly. I spent time in the Guard, the Reserves and Regular Army. The Guard and the Reserves are more likely to not notice if you're missing for awhile and you are still likely to get an Honorable discharge, even if you haven't been perfect. Especially, if you "know somebody." These are part-time soldiers with regular, everyday lives and it's easy for things to slip through the cracks on monthly drills. Seems Bush slipped through a crack and got away with it. Until now.

We can't let them paint the picture the Democrats are "dissing" Guard service, though. This "talking point" needs to be blunted. ASAP. Bush has spent a good many Guardsmen's lives in Iraq. That's the real "dis."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. yes, and it's quite the pathetic spin too
I mean, don't they pay these spin doctors good money? You'd think they could come up with something better than this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taeger Donating Member (914 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. THIS IS GREAT!!!!

The Godzilla has finally awoke. Up till Peter Jennings swipe at Clark, they COMPLETELY ignored the issue. Now they are dancing on the heads of pins saying how GW Bush

* Was honorably discharged
* Flying jets is "dangerous"
* Served his country honorably

etc...

They never address the core issue, Bush's missing time and his REFUSAL to take a physical. The issue will NOT go away as long as democrats keep firing at him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Actually, Bush Had Flying Privileges Revoked, So...
His aircraft carrier stunt was in total violation. Maybe he should have taken that drug test...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
For PaisAn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. Correction, please
I believe the person they're firing back at is Clark
After all it was Michael Moore who brought the issue up and Clark who refused to denounce Moore for doing so.

The following day Kerry called the deserter comment "over the top".

Let's be honest and give "credit" where credit is due.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. See Post #11 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
18. Retired Gen. William Turnipseed - that last name always gets me!
Edited on Tue Feb-03-04 06:28 PM by jean
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. yeah...right out of Gone With the Wind or something.
heheh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
21. Apparently Bush is only good at firing back verbally...not militarily.
And even then, its his cohorts, not HIM, that are "firing back."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #21
33. I don't think George W. is allowed to play with guns
too many family and friends shot over the years
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorPlum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
23. Oops - bad tactic WH folks
this just gives the story more legs - better to just shut up and let it quietly fade away . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #23
34. My Thoughts Exactly
There seem to be cracks in the Rovian armor. I doubt it will be anything short of a dogfight, but Bush hardly seems invincible (especially against Kerry or Clark on this issue!).





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
26. Good for Kerry. Let's send the deserter to a court marshall
and then televise the carrying out of the sentence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BruinAlum Donating Member (565 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
29. Why? They can't win this issue.
Let them keep bringing it up, they are just shooting themselves in the foot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
30. Assigned to Bama national guard so he could campaign for GOP? What?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
32. He THINKS it was desk work???
I think he thinks he doesn't want to answer specifically what he was doing back then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC