Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will Hackett Get a Rematch With Schmidt?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 09:13 AM
Original message
Will Hackett Get a Rematch With Schmidt?
Rumors are circulating in OH-2 that Hackett may run against Mean Jean if Dem primary winner Victoria Wilsun withdraws from the race...

http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060508/NEWS01/605080358/1056
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. WTF?
The primaries are over. Victoria Wulsin won. I'm a big Paul Hackett fan, but I think someone's just trying to stir up shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. here is what the article says:
"If Wulsin voluntarily withdraws her name from the race, Ohio elections law would allow the Democratic Party to name a replacement."

Frankly, I think it would be the best thing, not only for Ohio, but for the Democratic party, especially after what they did to Paul. I doubt it will happen though







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mntleo2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. But I Heard Him Say He Was Done With POlitics
Oh Stephanie Millier the day after he withdrew. I know people change their mind, but he sounded pretty adament. I am just sayin'...

Cat In Seattle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. He was done with politics because Victoria was going to run - he left
open the possibility of running if she did not run.

He had promised her he would not run, and she believed and entered the primary, and he was going to keep that promise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Why would the Dem primary winner withdraw?
Edited on Tue May-09-06 10:09 AM by TayTay
Health, inability to raise funds, family problems?

Why would the primary winner decide to withdraw suddenly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. She thinks Hackett has more name recognition?
Edited on Tue May-09-06 10:25 AM by OzarkDem
From the article, it sounds as though its something she would consider doing if the party asked her to. All the Dems in OH-2 wanted Hackett to run there again. It sounds like she's willing to make a sacrifice for the good of the party - pretty nice of her if you ask me.

from the article:

"What does Wulsin say?

"I do feel that I am the stronger candidate, but I also recognize that he is well known and I am not, and because I would prefer him to Jean, sure, I'd think about it," she said, adding that it's an "interesting" idea but no one has asked her to discuss the issue or to step aside."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Sounds like they want to Hackett the primary winner, eh?
People hated this crap when it happened to Hackett (not EXACTLY the same but kinda, eh?)
I would LOVE Hackett to run against Mean Jean Biotch, but not this way.
Not nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. Another head-slapper
Hackett's vociferous and suspicious response shows exactly shwhy he should have been the candidate while -again again again- we see an incredibly soft and naive officilal candidate msuignseriously on her own stepping down. If this idea is "nuts" as hackett claims what can you say about our cnandidate's rapid vapid response. Dear loving Lord of mercy, where do they train these people?

It is how the candidate herself appears to have handled the rumor that is the most appalling political greeness I have seen in a Senate race in recent history. Next time, will the esteeemed Senator from NY and others NOT meddle with a great candidate and replace him with someone so safe there is no danger she can compete with anyone? Or do they want to be roast lamb for the next century of the American Decline?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. I think Hackett got a huge write in vote
Something like double the amount of the person who
"won."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jai4WKC08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. If Hacket got more write-in votes than the person who "won"
Wouldn't that mean he won? Does Ohio not recognize write-in votes? If not, why would there be a place for them on the ballot? Did people just write his name in the margin? On second thought, don't they use Diebold? We have electronic voting here and you have to type in a name, letter by letter, to give it a write-in vote.

Sorry, but I'm really confused by your post. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
7. Interesting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
12. Hackett Denies This
From the article:

Hackett's response?

"Perhaps this is being floated by Republicans to hamper Vic's ability to raise money," he suggested, adding that he hasn't talked to anyone about the plan. "It's nuts, man. Crazy. Not going to happen. I've said it over and over again: I'm not running in that race. How else can I make that clear?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
13. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Just so you know...
promoting a 3rd party candidate in a race where a Dem is running (in this case Strickland) is against the DU rules.

Just sayin. Maybe you didn't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC