Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Roll Call: Probe widens, compliance could "shut down" 3 House committees

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 10:35 AM
Original message
Roll Call: Probe widens, compliance could "shut down" 3 House committees
Hookergate: If Feds' Requests Are Any Clue, This is Big
By Justin Rood - May 15, 2006, 8:51 AM
Federal prosecutors working the Cunningham case have requested so much information from Congress, three committees might have to "shut down" to comply, Roll Call's John Bresnahan reports.

U.S. Attorneys want boxloads of documents from the House Armed Services, Intelligence, and Appropriations committees, Bresnahan writes. They also want to interview at least nine current or former staffers.

It's clear from the requests that "the corruption probe that began with Cunningham has now clearly moved beyond the actions taken by the imprisoned former lawmaker to other Members," sources tell Roll Call, which notes recent stories naming Rep. Jerry Lewis (R-CA), appropriations committee chairman, as another target of the feds.

http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/000648.php


Justice Signals Wider Probe
Panels Asked to Cooperate By John Bresnahan
Roll Call Staff
May 15, 2006

Federal prosecutors are seeking to interview at least nine current or former staffers on the House Intelligence, Appropriations and Armed Services committees as they widen their probe into the bribery scheme involving former Rep. Duke Cunningham (R-Calif.), according to House officials.

http://www.rollcall.com/issues/51_122/news/13329-1.html?CMP=OTC-RSS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is good news in a sort of strange
way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boobooday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. By all means . . . WIDEN the PROBE
Edited on Mon May-15-06 10:41 AM by boobooday
Bring it all out in the light of day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. So what's Congress gonna do, simply say no?
Argue separation of powers like Bush would?

No snark here. I really would like to know; Congress is not in the habit of being shut down by a federal prosecution, and does have legitimate business of the People to.. ... ... that it should be conducting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. "How to fuck up a government in less than five years"
Edited on Mon May-15-06 10:44 AM by 0007
....and as the dollars falls, America sings "Goodnight Irene"

Goodnight Irene, goodnight
Goodnight Irene, goodnight
Goodnight Irene, goodnight Irene
I'll see you in my dreams

Sometimes I live in the country
Sometimes I live in town
Sometimes I take a few notions
I want to jump overboard in a river and drown

One night I got married
Now me and my wife settled down
Now me and my wife are parting
I want to jump overboard in a river and drown
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. Sounds like highly productive gridlock
even better than the Clinton era. Like the ecology healing itself under Ice Age glaciers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OregonBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
6. Shut down house intelligence committee? Do we want that right now
given the spying investigation going on? Would this be just too convenient for the Admin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Maybe it's a scare tactic? -Recently, the House made rule changes
to provide for continuity of govt in the event that a number of members became.....unavailable, let's say. I don't see why that wouldn't kick in this case.

There's a bit written about it here, but the details are sketchy-

http://www.rules.house.gov/archives/mass_incap.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. no, it would be inconvenient
If they were in session, they could do a "full investigation" that would exonerate the White House, and then retroactively legalize everything Bushco has done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. It's not like they are investigating wrongdoing at the Intel agencies
nor does it seem that they take their oversight rolls seriously.
So shutting them down won't hurt much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
8. Why do I feel like a pyromaniac at a wildly burning arson site?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. We are probably better off
if those committees can't do any work for awhile.

What do they really do, when they actually do anything?

Armed Services - new and creative ways to take benefits away from veterans

Intelligence - let's not even go there - it's pretty much an oxymoron anyway

Appropriations - pork-bloated budget bills with riders to allow drilling in ANWR and block 99% of offshore wind projects.


(ok I may be technically incorrect on the last one, but you get the idea).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. Far better to shut down Congress than let it continue to run amok.
When everything they do is bad, better to shut 'em off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArbustoBuster Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
13. As the old maxim states, sunlight is the best disinfectant.
Rip the lid off all the corruption and show it to the world so we can destroy the careers of those who are destroying our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. Sounds like they are trying to scare Congress into NOT investigating NSA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
15. wowowowowowowow
This is juicy. I don't even care if a few dirty dems go down in flames.... I know that it will sink more pub ships...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC