Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I emailed Jason Leopold

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LeftNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 04:42 PM
Original message
I emailed Jason Leopold
Edited on Mon May-15-06 04:42 PM by LeftNYC
and told him that I was behind him 100% and that I knew it was a tough time for him. And that he must be going crazy as the topic has switched to him and it may become personal. I dont think he would go to the wall if he didnt have proper sourcing, or sources that he trusted. And I dont believe the MSM or the official word.

We need investigative reporters like Jason and the people at Raw Story. I don't know any of these people, but the work they do goes beyond the dictation dance that happens everyday during these white house press briefings. The work they do is hard and Jason is putting his neck on the line for his story. I appreciate that and wish we had more of the Woodward-Bernstein types these days. Woodward himself is now a prime example of why Truthout, Thinkprogress, Raw Story, AmericaBlog are so important to what we believe in and talk about all day on this site.

So drop Jason a line, and let him know that we are still here, and reading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jayhawk Lib Donating Member (587 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. I was very excited
and then he embarrassed the hell out of me. I was wishing everybody Merry Fitzmas and found out he is not a credible source.

To hell with him.He has a responsibility to make sure of his facts before publishing. I will never trust him or Raw Story again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Has he been PROVEN wrong on this yet?
He still stands by it. I guess we have to wait until Wednesday...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Please tell me why Wednesday is a deadline?
I missed whatever provided that deadline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jumpoffdaplanet Donating Member (676 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. It's that 24 business hour thing
That's 3 regular days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
30. give or take for lunch breaks, traffic jams, coffee breaks
:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. According to forbes.com, the grand jury is expected to...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
35. But that might well be beside the point.
If the indictment's been handed up, it's handed up, and Leopold's correct.

If the GJ has to meet to hand up the indictment, it's not been handed up, and Leopold's wrong. The GJ may cover his ass and make the punchline to his story true.

Leopold worded things very strangely. It doesn't mean he's lying. He might not even be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
38. Thanks, but that seems to be interpretations and ad hoc information
to what Leopold actually wrote.

I'm skeptical of the article, but it's not fair to tag Leopold with things he didn't say or vary clearly indicate.

I don't think Leopold's article actually set up such a deadline. It seems more he said it could happen anytime after the 24 hours (whatever those 24 hours meant).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dora Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. "he embarassed the hell out of me"
No, that was all you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. For all the complaining that goes on on this site about
the MSM, no one seems to be believe anything unless it comes right from their mouth. Unbelievable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. Don't blame Mr. Leopold for your embarrasment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. What are you talking about? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout1071 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
34. Come on man, please don't embarrass the Jayhawk name.
That is all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
45. What does Raw Story have to do with Jason Leopold?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xeric Donating Member (586 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. I will email him
Just as soon as the story turns out to be true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. I don't understand. How does Leopold running with a story like this
do anyone any good in the first place? If Rove is to be indicted, then Patrick Fitzgerald will make that announcement. It's that simple. There is no need for any "investigative reporting" on this issue. If anything, I would expect people to be ticked off at Leopold for teasing them along like this for absolutely no other reason than to gain attention for himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. How did you arrive at that conclusion?
Leopold broke this story "for absolutely no other reason than to gain attention for himself?" In all seriousness, what evidence do you have for such a statement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corbett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
36. Journalists Break News - That's Part Of Their Job
Leopold is a real journalist and I have full confidence in his procedure of checking, rechecking and checking his sources again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Wow.
I guess you are content to wait and get your news from the Encyclopedia then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. You answered my question
with a question. That's not an answer.

Answer the question: How does Leopold running with a story like this do anyone any good in the first place?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Because information (if true) is always important to have in advance.
Because this way one can plan.

For example, if you have a radio network, you can take a scoop like this and use it to line up contingency guests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. So that one can, er...plan.
Now I get it: Knowing about a hypothetical Fitzgerald announcement a few hours in advance will strike a blow for station managers everywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. It helped us.
Thats all I can speak to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sheelz Donating Member (869 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #13
49. Randi Rhodes announced it on her program...
right after the story broke and she had no contingency guests lined up. She simply reported what she heard. I don't believe she has lined up amy guest, before or after the story broke.

Who would you invite other than Leopold?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Many of us care about what people close to the case are saying.

Additionally, much of what we "know" does not come from official channels. We will never get all the relevant information that way.

I agree with the OP.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. You don't think that Fitzgerald will tell the world if Rove gets indicted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #19
31. The media tells us. Fitzgerald tells them. Will the M$M tell us?
Or is Jason our only source?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #19
32. The media tells us. Fitzgerald tells them. Will the M$M tell us?
Or is Jason our only source?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. Isn't *reporting* what *reporters* are supposed to do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Brent doesnt believe in reporters I guess
He wants people to recite information instead. I guess we could have waited to find out about Watergate, um, never?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
40. It fucking made my weekend, I can tell you that much.
I heard him on KPFK on "Background Briefing with Ian Masters" on Sunday and the story sounds legit. I do remember thinking that the "24 business hours" sounded a little off-key. But please remember that Leopold didn't coin the phrase, he reported what his sources told him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. ....or the latest addition of the Farmers Almanac
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northamericancitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. After reading many of your posts on the TO story
I am wandering what your intentions are. Cause IMHO it looks like your goal is to badmouth honest journalists.

I will not read your justifications (I am not masochistic).

Sadly, for the first time in 2 years, I will use the Ignore button.

northamericancitizen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. So we shouldnt have any media? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
43. You are exactly right. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigbrother05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. LeftNYC, how quickly people turn over
it amazes me that here on DU, change their mind in an instant.
I'm sure Jason has suffered enough from this stupidity. And I'm sure he would not have released the story,
without credible sources. He explained the 24 working hours.
This is good news for us, and we have to be patient.
thanks for posting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. People on here are amazing to me...
they bitch and moan about the corporate media, but dont trust independent media until the results are solidified by one of the Big 3. Unbelievable. Would they have reacted, at the time, the same way if Leopold wrote that what Judy Miller wrote about WMD was untrue ?

Unbelievable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FARAFIELD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
27. SCREW JASON
People forget he was wrong last time about Rove being indicted along with Libby. Ill believe it when i see it. He is nothing but our left wing drudge. It should be a good place to go to get stories of interest. But you only have to be wrong a time or two to get on my list. And no matter how good a guy he is, writing something you want to be true doesnt make it so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. I guess we should scree Larry Johnson too. He has similar info as Jason..
(empty)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Link?
Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. didnt he post on here saying that Joe Wilson go that info
and that he heard from a source. I am being a dick. I just dont have time to go hunt it down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. OK, I'll see if I can find it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Here it is...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Thanks! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #37
44. sorry Ben...I know it was on here earlier. I think LJ put it on his site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FARAFIELD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #28
47. LARRY JOHNSON
Has never been wrong. LJ never has reported a story about ROves Indictment either. so get your facts strait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
42. Leopold is no "Woodward-Bernstein" type.
Edited on Mon May-15-06 08:27 PM by Clarkie1
You give him too much credit. He blew it, and he's lost a lot of credibility.

It's not the first time. I will not trust anything from his pen again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
46. What's his email address?
I have always thought that Jason Leopold has had the best coverage and information around about this case. His work has always been ahead of the curve and in depth. I've had a habit of getting excited every time that I see that there's a new article of his about Plamegate. So I was definitely excited over the weekend and I still am.

People around here need to take a breath and keep things in perspective. Of course the little details are subject to change like dates and deadlines. But the central point is that an indictment is in the works and it will be official very shortly. This same sort of thing happened around the Libby indictment where we were all waiting for "Fitzmas" and it was torture considering all of the warnings about a coming indictment. I think I remember it was Raw Story then that teased us and revved us all up about 10 days too soon. Yet Libby was indicted and we know the rest.

Sources say what they know or believe they know. They probably are also repeating rumor and speculation. I recall that some sources are in the WH so if they have wrong info that's what they are leaking and he'll have his revenge I'm sure.

The whole point of it all is that Rove is very close to indictment and we should all enjoy the show whether it happens this week or next we can say for certain that he is under pressure.

No more Scotty at the WH. Rove's policy demotion, his weight loss. This is all in preparation for what they know is coming. Now they know what people in NOLA felt as they saw Katrina approaching and they couldn't leave its path.

MSM sucks and they lie all of the time. Blogs like Raw Story Truthout etc, may not be perfect but at least you know that they are trying to what's right. Let's not eat our own people.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sheelz Donating Member (869 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
48. If you want support Leopold
why aren't you engaging in a massive email/calling campaign to the MSM and asking why they aren't reporting this important story?

Perhaps, Leopold could ask one or several sources to contact MSM with their information. Or ask other progressive investigative reporters to join?!

:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC