Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sooo...after Bush pardons Rove, then what?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 09:19 PM
Original message
Sooo...after Bush pardons Rove, then what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lindisfarne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Then he pardons Libby, and hopefully, Cheney (I say hopefully because
it will mean Cheney has finally been nailed for something and Cheney has resigned as VP. Then, we impeach *.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Why would Cheney resign?? If he gets indicted, the next day Bush
will pardon him, and they will continue as Pres and VP.

MARK MY WORDS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lindisfarne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Well, maybe Cheney would wait to resign until after impeachment
by the House and being tried and convicted by the Senate. He certainly is enough of a cocky Ba&0$$D to do that, even if it would put his party in more jeopardy than it already is.

In this case, I don't think * could pardon Cheney, but if anyone can provide relevant information about this, please do. (*, however, might BELIEVE he can pardon Cheney, and might even try, and who know what would happen? * has gotten away with violating law after law, simply because he BELIEVES he can.)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment
At the federal level, both the executive branch and the judiciary may be impeached, though different standards apply. For the executive branch, only those who have allegedly committed "treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors" may be impeached. Although treason and bribery are obvious, the Constitution is silent on what constitutes a "high crime."
<snip>
The impeachment procedure is in two steps. The House of Representatives must first pass "articles of impeachment" by a simple majority. (All fifty state legislatures as well as the District of Columbia city council may also pass articles of impeachment against their own executives). The articles of impeachment constitute the formal allegations. Upon their passage, the defendant has been "impeached."

Next, the Senate tries the accused. In the case of the impeachment of a President, the Chief Justice of the United States presides over the proceedings. Otherwise, the Vice President, in his capacity of President of the Senate, or the President pro tempore of the Senate presides. This would include the impeachment of the Vice President him- or herself.

In order to convict the accused, a two-thirds majority of the senators present is required. In the case of current office-holders, conviction automatically removes the defendant from office. Following conviction, the Senate may vote to further punish the individual by barring him from holding future federal office (either elected or appointed). Despite a conviction by the Senate, the defendant remains liable to criminal prosecution. It is possible to impeach someone even after the accused has vacated his office in order to disqualify the person from future office or from certain emoluments of their prior office (such as a pension.) If a two-thirds majority of the senators present does not vote "Guilty" on one or more of the charges, the defendant is acquitted and no punishment is imposed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egalitariat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Then Rove shreds his detailed journals***
nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. Can Congress prevent him from pardoning someone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. They Could Send Them to THE HAGUE!





pResidential Pardons Not Accepted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. A little bit of back-door action?
Oh, you mean POLITICALLY?

Sorry. Never mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. Bwah...haw..haw...
:rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demgrrrll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. I read that if he pardons them immediately they will lose their
ability to take the fifth. If the Congress goes our way and there are hearings he would have to tell the truth and nothing but or face another perjury charge. They are probably going to drag this out as long as possible. Not that a sociopath like Rove cares one way or another. I think we (and I include myself) project that he feels something about all this. The only thing that they feel, in my never was humble opinion, is pissed that someone can cause them problems that they are not able to spin away from. Maybe some narcissistic rage. I do not believe even for a second that they feel any kind of remorse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. Nixon wasn't even indicted, and he got pardoned. Pre-emptive pardon for
Rove?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WestSeattle2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. Gotta be honest here...
I've always wondered what the big deal was\is about Rove being indicted. They'll drag this out until * is on his way out the door, (http://www.backwardsbush.com), then * will pardon the whole lot of them, up to and including his VP. The pardons will be broad in scope, for whatever crimes they have committed, or, "may have committed". Heck, Kenny Boy will probably get his pardon also.

It's just business as usual in DC. Rove will never spend a day in prison, and he will not relinquish his political scheming for *. He might not work inside the WH, but his presence will be felt in the policy and electoral arenas until the last day.

We don't live in a democracy, the rules do not apply to all, and no matter how much we wish it were not so, it just is.

This is not what the founders envisioned, but that's what we've allowed to happen.

Apathy, greed, sub par educations, lack of critical thinking abilities, and outrageous focus on "self", were the death of America.

Very sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Maybe the lack of wars with integrity produced people without integrity?
Shooting wildly from the hip..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WestSeattle2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. The entire world seems to be producing
legions of folks lacking integrity. America certainly isn't alone that's for darn sure. Why so many of these scum end up in corporate boardrooms and high government office, not to mention religious hierarchies, truly baffles however.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. We Got Robbed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. Can ** pardon him before he's convicted?
Maybe Karl's case (and Libby's and whoever else's) can be drawn out long enough that ** won't be president any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. That's what the Ernie Fletcher, the governor of KY did when his staff
Monday, August 29, 2005
Fletcher Issues Blanket Pardons To All Involved (Except Himself) In Press Conference With Cheering Political Staff (Merit Employees Not Invited) Akin To Political Rally And Implies He Will Take The 5th Tomorrow Before The Grand Jury

Just minutes ago, Governor Ernie Fletcher, in one of the more audacious displays of political grandstanding, in a setting full of cheering and clapping political supporters, announced that he was thumbing his nose at the Kentucky criminal justice system, announced he was issuing "blanket" pardons (calling it amnesty, but Section 77 of the state constitution does not contain the term 'amnesty', only 'pardon') to anyone who "might have violated" state's Merit System laws. Yes, he left it that open and vague.

Sadly, Fletcher referred to the acts which have resulted in more than a dozen indictments as nothing more than "noodling" which is the term for catching fish without bait, which according to him calls for a punishment equal to what these crimes would result in if convicted. This was nearly identical to a newspaper interview Governor Fletcher conducted last week with the Maysville Ledger-Independent:

http://www.bluegrassreport.org/bluegrass_politics/2005/08/fletcher_issues.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
16. Saturday Night Massacre. Cause once Rove is pardoned, Fitz can make
him testify against Libby, Cheney and the rest, under threat of new perjury charges if he does not cooperate fully, and there will be no opportunity for Rove to plead the Fifth.

So, if W. tried to pardon Rove only, he will end up having to shut down Fitz completely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-18-06 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
18. Indicting Rove is no big deal when he gets to be pardoned. Jason Leopold
or no Jason Leopold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC